I'm with @mkultra Baalbuddy does the same joke on repeat constantly. It is either "horny elves that are incels" or "I like shortstacks". He does make good art. Shame its wasted on shit tier comics.
@dharmadudebro @mkultra
Artists are an unending wellspring of the disappointment from knowing how stupid and talented someone can simultaneously be.
Artists are an unending wellspring of the disappointment from knowing how stupid and talented someone can simultaneously be.
@Senpai-kun @dharmadudebro @mkultra a prerequisite of being an artist is being an eccentric/over-emotional retard
@harbeau @dharmadudebro @mkultra
Only because we live in clown world. Don't let the ZOGbots gaslight you into thinking that only gay retards can produce works of art.
Only because we live in clown world. Don't let the ZOGbots gaslight you into thinking that only gay retards can produce works of art.
@Senpai-kun @dharmadudebro @mkultra hitler was a gay retard though, I’m saying to be a good artist you have to be able to bridge the gap between emotion and aesthetics, and the more emotions you have to spare the more effort you’ll be willing to put into a work of art. This isn’t really an ideological thing, ideology will just inform it.
Follow
💀
@Dice @Senpai-kun @dharmadudebro @harbeau @mkultra
Hitler was shit not because he could paint nice looking things, but because all he did was replicate. He wasn't original. IIRC, he made a living by painting copies of postcards and the like.
@alyx @Senpai-kun @dharmadudebro @harbeau @mkultra
I know, Vernculis did a documentary on his life before he rose to power and in fact he is no different than the average artist who didn't paint until he felt like it.
Yet here you are, give him shit about originality when every single modern painting that is some incoherent mess like the examples on my picture gives off the same fucking energy/vibe/aesthetic.
Ugly, drab and disgusting pictures.
These aren't some war stories about the cruelty of the world. Guernica is ugly for a good reason, it's trying to portrait the ugliness of war. The horrible depiction of what is shows is for that reason and yet doesn't make you not want to look at the painting itself.
A lot of artists tho create ugly painting because to them there is nothing beautiful or worse, they think that ugliness is beautiful.
Their art to me seems so subpar, a kid drawing a house and his parents is more beautiful than the monstrosities they pump out.
And don't speak to me about originality, our cave drawing ancestors literally drew the world they saw. Themselves, the animals they used and hunted and their tools.
Anything you draw is an amalgamation of your experiences, visions and projection of the future.
People didn't make futuristic looking things by thinking what others didn't do before them in order to be original, but taking inspiration from it the people who came before them and bending it to fit their aesthetic.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with drawing the things your eyes see as true to them as possible. In fact, art faggots get real fucking mad when you don't draw humans to human proportions.
So stop being a criticizing faggot who only sees the demerits and flaws in one of the most basic forms of painting landscapes that everyday people can't even put the effort in and then don't speak ill of the ugliness these artists pump out in order to fulfill their vain desires and yes, I am speaking about the 3 in the example as I have at least done a wikipage-level research on their art and what it represents.
I know, Vernculis did a documentary on his life before he rose to power and in fact he is no different than the average artist who didn't paint until he felt like it.
Yet here you are, give him shit about originality when every single modern painting that is some incoherent mess like the examples on my picture gives off the same fucking energy/vibe/aesthetic.
Ugly, drab and disgusting pictures.
These aren't some war stories about the cruelty of the world. Guernica is ugly for a good reason, it's trying to portrait the ugliness of war. The horrible depiction of what is shows is for that reason and yet doesn't make you not want to look at the painting itself.
A lot of artists tho create ugly painting because to them there is nothing beautiful or worse, they think that ugliness is beautiful.
Their art to me seems so subpar, a kid drawing a house and his parents is more beautiful than the monstrosities they pump out.
And don't speak to me about originality, our cave drawing ancestors literally drew the world they saw. Themselves, the animals they used and hunted and their tools.
Anything you draw is an amalgamation of your experiences, visions and projection of the future.
People didn't make futuristic looking things by thinking what others didn't do before them in order to be original, but taking inspiration from it the people who came before them and bending it to fit their aesthetic.
I see absolutely nothing wrong with drawing the things your eyes see as true to them as possible. In fact, art faggots get real fucking mad when you don't draw humans to human proportions.
So stop being a criticizing faggot who only sees the demerits and flaws in one of the most basic forms of painting landscapes that everyday people can't even put the effort in and then don't speak ill of the ugliness these artists pump out in order to fulfill their vain desires and yes, I am speaking about the 3 in the example as I have at least done a wikipage-level research on their art and what it represents.
At worst, one could call Hitler's art competent but unimaginative.
The art world that rejected him, at best, gives us abominations which can only be forged by a hatred of beauty.
I'll take the fucking postcard architecture.