@Effortless The gassy Jew is right.
People keep ignoring the 6 million other victims, gays, gypsies, political dissidents, etc...
I wasn't sure how Jehovah's Witnesses can be Jewish, then I remembered they considered Jewish racially, 3 generations back, so there can be an overlap.
image.png
image.png
People keep ignoring the 6 million other victims, gays, gypsies, political dissidents, etc...
I wasn't sure how Jehovah's Witnesses can be Jewish, then I remembered they considered Jewish racially, 3 generations back, so there can be an overlap.
image.png
image.png
Follow
💀
@diresock @Effortless@noagendasocial.com
Never seen that chart before. I learned something interesting today. Thanks.
Maybe because I'm from Europe, but I put more emphasis on ethnicity. A discussion on whether Jews qualify as it's own race or not bores me and I ultimately find it irrelevant. They are a distinct ethnicity. That cannot be denied, and they were/are oppressed based on their ethnicity.
Also, it is quite sad that all the other holocaust victims get ignored in all this. Kinda like all the other slaves get ignored when a black grievance olympian enters a discussion.
@applejack @alyx @Effortless The answer to some of those questions is war-time propaganda.
The concentration camps footage was used as propaganda, while the Holodomor was far from sight and far from mind.
With Jews in media and finance, the Jewish angle was emphasized to squeeze more money out of wealthy Jewish investors (wars aren't cheap you know).
Fun fact: some of the footage of the liberation of the concentration camps is a reenactment by the Soviets.
It was haram to talk about it, until the step-sister of Anne Frank casually pointed it out in a documentary (though people still don't like talking about it).
She just pointed at a photo, a frame from one of the videos, and said it's not real, since there's no snow on the ground, which means it was shot in the wrong season.
War photographers weren't usually on the tip of the spear, even when they visited the front lines.
So it makes sense the event was not documented when it happened, and the Soviets recreated it later for propaganda reasons.
Also all the rape would probably be bad optics.
The concentration camps footage was used as propaganda, while the Holodomor was far from sight and far from mind.
With Jews in media and finance, the Jewish angle was emphasized to squeeze more money out of wealthy Jewish investors (wars aren't cheap you know).
Fun fact: some of the footage of the liberation of the concentration camps is a reenactment by the Soviets.
It was haram to talk about it, until the step-sister of Anne Frank casually pointed it out in a documentary (though people still don't like talking about it).
She just pointed at a photo, a frame from one of the videos, and said it's not real, since there's no snow on the ground, which means it was shot in the wrong season.
War photographers weren't usually on the tip of the spear, even when they visited the front lines.
So it makes sense the event was not documented when it happened, and the Soviets recreated it later for propaganda reasons.
Also all the rape would probably be bad optics.
@diresock @applejack @Effortless @alyx Wrong: the Holocaust is so real that it’s ILLEGAL to question it.
@alyx @diresock @Effortless@noagendasocial.com Why are only the six million remembered? Why wasn't there ever a Nuremberg for the Holodomor? Why did the US turn a blind eye to Katyn and other massacres? It's almost like it's just one big useful tool with no actual meaning