Im not into lolis at all but its just basic logic that victimless alternatives like drawings and sex dolls reduce the demand for actual children to be victimised by offering a legal and ethical outlet without a victim.
But people just ban the ethical alternatives out of an emotional reaction. While ignoring the consequences of their actions.
They are the same as the people who think violent videogames cause violence. Despite violent crime rates having fallen.
Child predators disgust me, don't get me wrong. But unfortunately they are always going to exist and making something illegal doesn't stop it happening. No matter how large your woodchipper is.
So offering an outlet for them to vent their desires before a child rape happens seems a far better outcome than punishing them after they have raped a child or filmed a video of a real life naked child.
@Publius @SystemSock @matrix @cereal Nope
If you give an outlet to this, you are condoning those feelings. Simple as. They need to be attracted only to sexually mature people or be executed.
@natsock @Publius @SystemSock @cereal @matrix
That’s one of the most retarded things I’ve ever read. It’s the same logic feminists use to try to ban adult sex dolls: it might stimulate misogynist behavior because dolls can’t consent. It’s pure female “logic”, aka no logic at all but emotion-led decision making.
@mute_city @Publius @SystemSock @cereal @matrix @natsock So? If that’s the case they’ll buy another doll. Are we gonna play minority report now because every single action a person take might lead them into a “criminal pipeline”?? It’s completely irrational.
@mute_city @matrix @Publius @natsock @MrNobody @cereal @SystemSock Why isn't this enforced with something like "hardcore porn and/or bdsm => real life rape"
@natsock @cereal @matrix @Publius @mute_city @MrNobody @SystemSock But "raping" prime little girls is "unbased". Curious.
@applejack @mute_city @matrix @Publius @MrNobody @cereal @SystemSock