no offence to @Halo but I'd never be on his instance (sorry friend)
@bot@kiwifarms.cc
@bot @applejack @graf @Halo @rlier23 because you’re literally not a pedophile unless you think about or actually touch real children. Loli art is not of real children and this constant overreaction you have to is fucking grating at this point. I don’t even get into shit like this because it’s not worth it, but you constantly go on about it.
Maybe get a real hobby, bot. Take a nap. Get some rest and come back later. This whole shtick is fucking frustrating and old.
@rlier23 @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo It's literally just true
>The term pedophile is commonly used by the public to describe all child sexual abuse offenders.[8][12] This usage is considered problematic by researchers, because many child molesters do not have a strong sexual interest in prepubescent children, and are consequently not pedophiles.[11][12][25] There are motives for child sexual abuse that are unrelated to pedophilia,[81] such as stress, marital problems, the unavailability of an adult partner,[102] general anti-social tendencies, high sex drive or alcohol use.[103] As child sexual abuse is not automatically an indicator that its perpetrator is a pedophile, offenders can be separated into two types: pedophilic and non-pedophilic[104] (or preferential and situational).[9] Estimates for the rate of pedophilia in detected child molesters generally range between 25% and 50%.[105] A 2006 study found that 35% of its sample of child molesters were pedophilic.[106] Pedophilia appears to be less common in incest offenders,[107] especially fathers and step-fathers.[108] According to a U.S. study on 2429 adult male sex offenders who were categorized as "pedophiles", only 7% identified themselves as exclusive; indicating that many or most child sexual abusers may fall into the non-exclusive category.[10]
@bot @applejack @graf @Halo @rlier23 are you saying that everyone here fantasizes about real children? That’s a bold claim and huge if true.
The first is to avoid persecution by law enforcement and potential incarceration, and the second is so they can justify their fetish for children and live with themselves, albeit in a state of denial.
@wikifarms @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 Repress my ass, dork
@wikifarms @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 Really forced to give you a dictionary entry
@wikifarms @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 I don't know what's more interesting. You leftistmemeposting what the definition says or npcbrain "law says so so it's true"
The "criminals" that get caught are usually the retards or very rarely, the very big fish. And this usually goes for most crimes except violent ones that usually leave huge amount of evidence.
The second is, if any of us was into kids, we'd just need images of children, which aren't illegal and are freely available on the Internet through Google.com. Lolis are 2D, that's another barrier you'd have to go through for no reason.
You schizos are wastes of oxygen. You'd be wasting my testicle sweat as well if that's all you had to mouth breathe to survive.
@bot @applejack @graf @Halo @rlier23 loli isn’t legal everywhere either, you fucking retard.
Since you’re from the farms, you probably remember Isabella in regards to Chris. That came up in the discussion bc she’s into loli and with people discussing the legality.
@rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 It's definitely more legal. Generally isn't even enforced. Usually if people get charged for it it's when it's found along with the higherres equivalent
:schizo: 1e+6 litres :flag_china:
while this is true, i still dont know what you define as a pedo, it really comes off like you think people that are only lolicons are both into lolis and real children
if your logic is loli = child = technically pedo, i can see that making some sense
but if you think that just because people like lolis, they also like real children,
that'd kind of be a woman moment ngl fr fr no cap on god 
@kilostere @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23
What makes us like lolis if its not that they look like children? It's such a weird idea. Do you have an attraction to the concept of a drawing?
The context around it matters, but the context is you like the bodies of LGs, but "this is an actual child, so moral part of my brain kicks in and I reject it"
The context is not "since this is a drawing, it's attractive"
bro, i dont even hate pedophiles, me 'having a moral meltdown' aint the case here
when i see a loli, i go 'holy shit, cute erotic little girl [latest sobbing emoji here]'
real children have gross faces and dogshit personalities
they simply just arent very similar other than the stature of their figure and their age
might as well drop something for the homies while im here
@kilostere @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 What's gross about their faces? That seems silly. Loli personalities are literally based on IRL lolis, just more idealised
personally, the iris' of the eyes and the entire noses, lips are bearable but still
you cant find a nicer looking face outside of 2d, also did you just say irl loli
@kilostere @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 I get liking 2D more, but the reason still lines up in the same direction. LGs are cute because they have big eyes, mouths, heads, and small noses. Anime lolis are cute because they're running along that same line. They're cute because they're more childlike than actual children
i'm well aware of that (though i dont usually end up liking the style of those guys), couldnt care less if the art was based off of a two year old holocaust victim,
stylized lolis hot, children not, simple as :kuroko_sip:
@kilostere @Melon @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23 Admits pedophilia is rampant among lolicons, but still considers them entirely unrelated 
@Ryuujin @rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @kilostere @rlier23 You're here arguing about it too, friend. If it's not important, just admit that drawings of naked little girls is pedophilic
@rikkatakarada @bot @graf @Halo @rlier23
Sub portion of DSM5 describes a pedophilic sexual orientation, and doesn't specify "real" anywhere. Maybe you could say it's implied, but if you have an attraction to drawings of children, there's probably a reason outside of "I have a fetish for paper"
Even says it sticks to people "who deny any sexual attraction to prepubescent children, despite substantial objective evidence to the contrary"
