They are really salty about that
@bot @Elfie @Terry @DrRyanSkelton Though 9-12 would be a lot better 
@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton Cuter, more adaptable, less expired
@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton 1880s US had it at 7-12. Before Rome it was less defined. In England too was it normal, and you get other examples
https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1300/J056v16n02_03
I know it's not viable today. That's part of why I argue for it as the ideal (and I don't coom)
Nigga time travelling just to ask other nibbas the age of their wives, madlad
@shadow @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton
@applejack @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton
Sounds fun tbh, could be like isekai but my nigga would just be surviving the ancient world while asking the most dumbass questions ever
"I have no time to speak about my wife, Rome has been vanquished by my hand, Carthage Lives!"
@Terry @applejack @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton
Husky_1645219014131_DITWXLM76S.jpg
Husky_1645219032972_K8LBEWQJUX.jpg
Husky_1645219052466_VNXJ919MAJ.jpg
Do you really expect me to believe that? Also 7 was the minimum age for betrothal not marriage.
Lasting relationships need of constant care and boundaries, a relationship built on abuse wouldn't last long plus coomers were killed even in the ancient times
Unless you were a jew
@Terry @applejack @bot @DrRyanSkelton
@Elfie @Terry @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton I don't think anyone disagrees with that. What's the point of it?
And marriage depends on the consent of the Pater Familias and you don't want your daughter to die at childbirth, plus a father know men and will find the best prospect available.
Family is above individual happiness, if a woman can be happy in marriage excellent, but's not necesary, people should think more about duties rather than rights.
@basadeskaiser @Elfie @Terry @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton Happiness evolved as a driver of function. Women's role is as wives and mothers. The happy thing is they're genuinely happier with this
@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton It says marriage and then it's in that one specific case anyway. I literally posted three sources directly saying marrying 7yos wasn't abnormal
Regardless, whatever tbh. I'd be pretty happy with a 12yo wife
betrothal basically means engaged. Did you really think everyone was fucking 7 year olds in the 1880s?
@Terry @Elfie @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton I know what it means, and that's literally not what the text says.
No, 7yos aren't really fuckable yet. I have found very little data on this, but from what I can gather girls are able to take a dicking at like 9-10+. Cunnies just physically too small earlier
@Terry @Elfie @bot @shadow @DrRyanSkelton I thought you were a lolicon
Also, how exactly do you plan on getting a wife?
Time traveling of course, hyperboren Elvish lolis are best choice I reckon
@Terry @applejack @bot @DrRyanSkelton
@shadow @Elfie @Terry @bot @DrRyanSkelton It literally says "the law was more of a guide" and then lists examples
These were the absolute minimum ages though and it was usually much higher depending on time, place, and class.
Also get real, no one in the middle ages would have let you anywhere near their daughter (let alone modern times). If you really want to have a family stop being a pedophile coomer and find an adult. Something makes me think you're fixated on more than family though.
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/transactions-of-the-royal-historical-society/article/age-at-marriage-in-england-from-the-late-seventeenth-to-the-nineteenth-century/F5641BCC2F37FC37DEED16EC2B7F594E