I've noticed that those who say, "Video Games will influence you to be more violent!", "The internet is teaching you bad things!", and "Porn makes you want to rape someone!" are often those who are the easily influenced.
This is because they have no father, having to substitute fiction for fatherly affection.
Thank you Confucius for channeling your soul into me for this insight.
This is because they have no father, having to substitute fiction for fatherly affection.
Thank you Confucius for channeling your soul into me for this insight.
Follow
@ninja8tyu it's kind of crazy how many people now think "video games won't make you violent" but also think "looking at loli makes you want to rape a child" and their only argument is that sex is different than violence.
idk if i wanna be around those kind of people 
they might see gay porn on accident and then rape me.
The difference is that people play the games not only for the violence but a host of other things. Games that only violent and nothing else are not common.
Loli has a "side channel" or being art so you could claim that a loli is artfully drawn. Or maybe there is some implied plot or depicts a popular character or something. I just don't see it having anything else to offer. So it's "flatter" as a medium and therefore the ratio of "loli" to "art" is much higher in the content.
There is also the fact that violence is not as abhorrent as children being sexualized, at least in my mind. So a volume of "child" weighs more than the same volume of "violence".
In addition, people who only play violent games or play games SPECIFICALLY because they are violent, are much more likely to fit into the violent person category. So, if your game library is 100% violent games of all types, this says something.
It follows that people who enjoy loli SPECIFICALLY because there are children in it, are much more likely to fit into the child-sexualizing person category. So if your pic library is 100% loli, this also says something.
This is not a defense of the loli=childrape thesis, just thoughts on your argument above.