If a baraag user is reported by multiple different people for trying to pass off AI generated content as hand-drawn art, I will give them 72 hours to either live stream or screen record their process with the drawing program being used in real time to prove the allegations wrong.

I will not accept automatic speedpaint exported videos as evidence (eg. procreate) because it does not show the whole screen as the creator rotates the canvas or clicks to pick different brushes, layers and colors.

Follow

@satori this is fair. It reminds me of speedrunning proof standards that a lot of games have where you need a handcam or something along those lines. Given that baraag is mostly full of artists and they're all mostly there for the same reason, I don't think this will be taken advantage of to attempt deplatforming people either. That would be more of a concern over on Twitter.

I do wonder if you could potentially accept a PSD or whatever the equivalent is for other programs. I know Photoshop has AI tools in it now, but it should still be pretty easy to tell if it has been used when you have access to all the information.

Also, does this apply to only fully generated art, or using AI at any point? I know there are a few artists who generate backgrounds with AI but the characters are drawn, and they are honest about using that technique.

@beardalaxy I would also accept a PSD file that is privately sent to me. This only applies to fully generated art that is seemingly edited to fix errors or add human made elements, yet lacks the #AI tagged disclosure.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.