@mischievoustomato Unironically the "artists" that are malding the loudest about ai are these niggers:

@EdBoatConnoisseur @mischievoustomato HAHA SORRY FURFAGS
IF I WANTED TO SEE A FURRY CHICK ID COMMISSION MY GPU
THE RESULTS ARE 1000X BETTER THAN ANYTHING THESE FAGS PUT OUT
@bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @mischievoustomato noooooo you have to pay $350 and wait 6 months for a meme and then hope you ever actually get it
@skylar @bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @mischievoustomato I like hitting random artists with the implication that what they posted was AI generated. A simple "Stable diffusion?" is ego shattering.

If artists would spend all the time screeching about AI on drawing they would be at a professional skill level like Huke or Redjuice where they are irreplaceable.

Xitter artists won't police their own community or hold themselves to any standards whatsoever. They deserve less.

Usually it's not even the riggers fault because they can only work when the lazy ass artist gets off their ass and gives them the art to work with.

The other really really evil thing these niggas do is they get really mad if you ever think about tracing their "art" but that's literally how you learn to draw. They don't want anyone else to learn to do what they do. They're not even really mad about AI scraping work or whatever. They're mad that they used to be special and now they're not anymore. If thousands of people suddenly learned to draw on their own, xitter artists would be just as mad about that as they are about AI.
@lonestarr @Goalkeeper @bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @cunnyoisseur @mischievoustomato very true, they were also big mad about pewdiepie for some reason

>waaaaaaah it's STEALING
my brother in Christ, you posted this online for everyone to see

It's always hilarious when they post "DO NOT REPOST without permission". Nigga what are you going to do? Cry shit and cum?

@Goalkeeper @lonestarr @bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @cunnyoisseur @mischievoustomato imagine what's his name who painted a cathedral ceiling having a public freakout because people 400 years later could come in and see it while taking a tour

HOW DARE THEY NOT PAY ME TO LOOK AT THE PUBLIC CEILING

@Goalkeeper @lonestarr @bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @cunnyoisseur @mischievoustomato another problem that AI sidesteps entirely is artists playing cringe jewish legalism games like "um akshually you don't own that thing you paid me to make for you, you own a loicense to use it according to my 133245 page terms of service"
and they wonder why this shit puts people off
Art is cheap. AI makes it cheaper. I laugh when I see people complain about AI art, when some of it is excellent. I also laugh at all of the clowns on deviant art who try to sell their "art." Like nigger... that guy over there is making the same shit for free.

The guys I really give credence to are the ones training and then using AI to make truly unique works. If you're feeding the machine and then getting it to produce, that is in and of itself an artform.
Follow

@Humpleupagus @skylar @lonestarr @Goalkeeper @bronze @EdBoatConnoisseur @cunnyoisseur @mischievoustomato I view AI art in the same way I view every other technological advancement in the creative fields. It's just another medium. Painting didn't go away when the camera was invented. Live performances are still how musicians make the majority of their money. Synth didn't destroy real instruments. It shifts demographics a little, but I think as long as there is somebody doing a thing, there will be people who enjoy the thing.

There is AI art out there that is pretty cool, but a lot of it I personally just kind of view it as kind of cheap. Make no mistake, there is real art like that too. Likening it back to music, I don't see any real difference between someone who just puts a bunch of loops together and someone who prompts an AI to make some song.

I also think that the kinds of people who were paying for art in the first place aren't going to suddenly stop paying for it because they can just generate stuff instead. I like the kind of personality each artist brings to the table, and if I'm commissioning something it's extremely nice to be able to give them a bunch of references and more complex ideas. Then I don't have to fiddle around with an AI and watch it like a hawk for an hour just so I can get something relatively close to what I was picturing. On the flipside, I'm not going to ask an artist to draw a picture of a random NPC in my D&D campaign. Beforehand I would just find a picture online that looked kind of similar, now I can generate one that looks a little bit more similar (although even that usually takes some time).

What I'm mostly getting at is that I don't think it actually affects artists *that much* at the end of the day. Perhaps it does a little bit, but not in a way that's dissimilar from any other technological advancement. The only thing that is really annoying about it to me is just how much of it gets shit out, especially if it's taking up space on a website like pixiv or something. I think it's totally fine (preferable, even) to segregate it. I also hate how it's the only thing that comes up on Google images anymore, because I don't always want some AI slop coming up when I search for "white knight on horse" you know what I mean?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.