@EvolLove Pimozide 2mg daily, completely cures the urge to cross-dress, and any desire for sex-reassignment surgery.
Unfortunately, it has serious long-term side-effects, but the whole field isn't even being researched, so improving the medication is out of the question.
Sad.
Eddie Fucksaw That's a risk I'm willing to let them take
@chainsaw_appreciator @EvolLove Movement disorder (motor ticks) is certainly a better alternative to a constant delusion that happiness can only be attained by cutting off your dick, putting on a dress, and fiddling some kids.
It's the more moral option, not only for society, but for the patient as well.
That is exactly my point.
The lifelong hormone treatments comes with a very high morbidity. Serious risks of developing cancer and or mental problems.
The suicide risk among those on hormone treatment is much higher than among gender confused in general.
Homosexuality in itself is also dangerous, they have too many sex partners and often spread lots of disease around.
It is only when the cure for gay have side effects that side effects suddenly are a problem.
this is the beauty of prep. it encourages them to continue destroying thrmselves. as a taxpayer, i fully support "free" prep and to make the gay lifestyle "protected"
@coded_artist
Fascinating.
Communism and Sodomy - Lenin vs Stalin
These homoerotic propaganda posters are from the 50’s-60’s
____
- 100 years ago, a forgotten soviet revolution in LGBTQ rights: Review of Dan Healey’s book, Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia
“The socialist October Revolution in 1917 brought about fundamental, thoroughgoing changes in Russian society.
Millions of people in the largest country on Earth quickly found themselves far freer than they had ever been under the despotic, anti-Semitic Tsar, the strictures of the church, and the brutality of Russian capitalism and landlordism.
Alongside the working class taking control of the Russian economy, the Russian Revolution also led to unprecedented advances in the liberation of women and LGBTQ people.
In Homosexual Desire in Revolutionary Russia, Wales-based scholar Dan Healey relates the LGBTQ struggle in the Russian Revolution, the historic progressive gains made under Lenin and the Bolsheviks, and the later return under Stalin to state persecution and homophobic, sexist puritanism.
___
Homosexual desire in Revolutionary Russia : the regulation of sexual and gender dissent (2001, 428 pages).
I haven’t read this but based on the cover and info in this article, it’s pro-sodomy.
https://archive.org/details/homosexualdesire0000heal
____
Famously, the Russian Revolution brought the decriminalization of homosexuality in an act both nearly unique in Europe and astonishingly advanced in a country with semi-feudal conditions in vast parts where religious hierarchy had long been a cornerstone of the state.
Healey reveals long-forgotten, even concealed, facts showing even greater advances: the early Soviet Union was the first industrialized state to recognize same-sex marriage, the USSR alongside Weimar Germany briefly led the world in gender corrective surgery, and Soviet medical experts working alongside transgender people began exploring the idea of gender not being a simple binary of man and woman but, instead, a spectrum.
____
Even as reformist socialists like the followers of Karl Kautsky took conservative views on sexuality in the early 20th century, the Russian Bolsheviks forged ahead because they were based on a movement from below.
Same-sex marriage recognition occurred almost organically: two people of the same legal gender applied to be married, and local courts and officials in the wake of the Russian Revolution quickly decided there was no basis on which to deny the request.
___
Healey discusses at length the case of one of the parties to this marriage, anonymized as “Evgenii Fedorovich M.” Assigned female at birth, Evgenii Fedorovich struggled with gender identity and inconsistent support from family until the Russian Revolution gave him the chance to express himself as a man.
While working as a political instructor far from his village of birth, he courted and married a woman, “S.”, and formed a family. Tragically, Evgenii Fedorovich’s reassignment to a distant city split the relationship and, suffering from psychiatric issues, he sank into alcoholism.
___
Revolutionary Rethinking of Sex and Gender
Evgenii Fedorovich’s discussions with Soviet psychiatrists informed a revolutionary political analysis of sex and gender.
Healey devotes chapter six of his book to describing how Russian attitudes toward same-sex relationships quickly evolved from the Revolution to the end of the first Five Year Plan (1932) from challenging the idea of same-sex relationships as “perverse,” to medicalization, to the statement by biologist N. K. Kol’tsov that “there is no intermediate sex, but rather an infinite quantity of intermediate sexes.”
Several Soviet doctors were assembled into an expert commission, and ideas such as Kol’tsov’s found broad support. These doctors were being driven by experience: as soon as gender corrective surgery began to be practiced in the early 1920s, its practitioners were inundated with inquiries from ordinary Russians who had fought with their own bodies for their whole lives and finally saw a means of resolution.
___
Stalinist Reaction
While this commission of doctors put forward highly advanced ideas on gender and gender identity, their ideas were, tragically, never fully realized. With Stalin’s consolidation of power in the late 1920s came a vicious social reaction. In 1933, the Soviet state terminated the commission, and in 1936 it restored homosexuality to the status of a crime in Russia.”
https://mronline.org/2017/11/07/100-years-ago-a-forgo
Sexual attraction instinct is not great at identifying what you SHOULD have sex with and what you shouldn't. It just pushes for sex...
IMO "sexual preference" is something learned from early experience. Social pressure used to guide people in the right direction and experiences would give them the right preferences. But with social pressure removed, deviancy rises.
Imagine believing that you were born already attracted to people dressed in furry suits, how did your genes even know about it
@medievalwars @EvolLove @cjd Our genes do have that.
Your brain is a cluster of neural networks (NN) that recognize patterns.
NNs are excellent in some respects, like no input is invalid, no matter what you give it, it will output... something, the result might not make sense though.
Now think of sexual characteristics as input variables, such as shoulder to waist ratio, breast size, etc...
All these variables have a normal range, that we can encounter in nature, and our NN can recognize as valid sex partners.
But what if you give it input that it never evolved to handle, like a car, or a furry?
Why are some car designs referred to as "sexy"?
Why do furry characters in children's cartoons not seen as ugly?
Because the NN will output something no matter what the input is, for some people, excessive designs (fetish content) produce a positive result.
For normal people, you can see this in Olympian human designs, 8 heads tall, practically non-existant, most people will never see such a person in their lives, and yet, you open a comic book and you don't think of these characters as ugly, do you?
Input slightly outside of what our NN evolved for is usually universally accepted, and no one bats an eye.
As you get into more extreme input, the smallest changes in our brain patterns can make the difference between attraction and revoltion.
So it is possible that you have a fetish you are simply not aware of, and you can go your whole life never knowing about it.
@coded_artist
All forms of homosexuality are some kind of deviant behavior, brain dammage.
By now we could have had some hormone therapy to cure it, but oh no. That is unhuman and cruel, can't have that.
The faggots have to be faggots, because "it is part of their identity"
This is the same as encouraging anti social behavior. While children with "ADHD" are put on drugs to make them into obedient slaves, fagots and troons are encouraged to carry on.