https://reason.com/2019/05/29/16-year-old-girl-sex-porn-child-court-case/ Dumb teenagers doing dumb teenager things are not the same as pedophiles and child pornographers.
@ArdanianRight 16 is well past the pedophilia territory anyway, and the only "victim" here is the girl herself - but of course, she could potentially contribute to Thought Crimes being committed, so yeah...
@ChristiJunior @ArdanianRight Underage is underage and the law is the law. No matter how many grown men want a disclaimer or rationaltion for their lust.
Lol
Lol
Follow
@Zilya @ArdanianRight @ChristiJunior
The law is the law, but the law can be retarded.
Here a 15 year old can have sex with any one over 15, but just describing it in their diary makes them a producer of child porn.
@matrix @Zilya @ArdanianRight ð¤¡
