This is a decent video since dumb fuck retarded Americans need to be constantly reminded that SJWs aren't liberals.
However, like the comment say, the distinction between "socialists" and "SJWSs", while important, is ultimately of absolutely no consequence because both have the same axioms, view the world through the same lens and use the same language, they just focus on different topics.
https://youtu.be/wFVZER8t4Bg
@Publius
That's true however by giving up the label you concede to the enemy
The issue is that the commies have such overwhelming numbers and institutional power particularly in media and education. That its almost impossible to resist them, particularly when they change language and definitions.
@Publius
That's true but the only way how to resist removal of information (which is what constantly arbitrarily redefining words is) is to hold onto it
@matrix I agree. Just diagnosing the problem is the first step to a solution
@matrix Honestly I've mostly dropped my use of "SJW" for "socialist" because of that reason. "SJW" just seems to bespeak an extremely superficial understanding of the problem; that this thinking and behavior was only bad because of how wacky and insane those people acted, rather than the ideology or the institutions that produced them.
@matrix
The issue is that the communists rebrand themselves by coopting the names of other movements.
When communism got a bad name they rebranded as socialist. Then they rebrand themselves as liberals. So when the classical liberals (the original users of the label) continue to use the co-opted label. Its going to cause confusion.