@irie
You are making a moral judgment over something that is morally neutral and thus you're just pointlessly moralfagging.
Modern culture and politics still rejects evolution so you are barking at the wrong tree.

@matrix I'm not making anything of what you just wrote, that's all in your head. It's not a moral judgement to say that Darwinism is inherently anti-tradition, always preferring progress and new over old, which it values as bad. That's nothing to do with morale, unless you're retarded I guess. But you're probably the wrong person to have a discussion with about such topics. My mistake.

@irie
You called it cancer and degenerate. That is a moral judgment. Darwinism values proof, maybe your tradition shouldn't make up shit.

@irie @matrix You better explain that.

@miria @matrix Darwinism deifies progress and defiles the old. There you have your explanation. For more you simply use your God-given ability to DYOR.

@irie @matrix Not true. It could be argued some traditions are directly the result of Darwinism. You also ignored explaining your other claims like it being anti-social and nihilist.

@miria Darwinian traditions deify progress and discard the old. This is covered in my argument. Darwinian is inherently antisocial as it worships struggle as a means for progress. Do I have to explain to you what that means? Do you even understand the meaning of Darwinism? I expect you to understand what you are trying to defend, that's the least you could do.

@irie >Darwinian traditions deify progress and discard the old
Traditions cannot deify progress, that makes no sense.
>Darwinian is inherently antisocial
Why? You say "it worships struggle as a means of progress", but how is that antisocial?
>I expect you to understand what you are trying to defend
I'm not trying to defend anything, I'm asking you to explain the reason for your claims.