Nick Fuentes on age of consent. Man who has never felt an embrace of a woman he was not related to advocates for rethinking legal age of sexual maturity.

I guess calling him gay is getting to him and he's trying to hint at the real reason why he's never had sex.
Follow

@josh While this take is a bit sus, you also need to consider that you americans are absolutely retarded around age of consent.
Find 17.9999999999999999 year old hot -> pedo
Find 18.0000000000000000001 year old hot -> no problem

· · Web · 2 · 3 · 7
@matrix @josh Lol I know me, a clear pedo, agreeing with your point here doesn't help much, but I swear I'm actually agreeing from a logical perspective not a sexual incentivized one. There's a larger mental difference between 19 and 25 than there is between 16 and 19. These standards are not helping any child, and they save no one when we're talking about, as you put it, 17.999999999(infinitum) year olds, or even 16 year olds. And also mind you that his take about the pedo female teachers is also true (nick), where as female pedos get special treatment in society.

In truth, the age of consent exists as a blanket to protect as many of those who are socially acknowledged as most vulnerable as possible while the point needs to be made to leave as many of those who don't need that blanket protection as possible alone at the same time. Agency and personal responsibility is a lost virtue in this modern age, where as now we play number games and treat people as statistics. This is a major issue in multiple areas of society which is why I'm actually trying to come at this perspective from an unbiased position.

A major issue in most rhetoric and social policy is that academia-type statements and papers and what other else have you are "gospel" as nick puts it. You can't even have a proper debate in an open chat-forum about unfalsifiable topics anymore without some 99head coming in and trying to DEBOONK your mutual hypothesis craftings with a fucking wikipedia article and 20 completely unrelated STOODIES that only in passing address a mere portion of what you were going on about in an effort to tie existing ideas together in new ways, but hey, can't have that because it's not PEER REVOOWED.

Academia-mentality garnished with college culture has poisoned scientific debate and research, along with social policy debates and organized consensus being polluted by pearl-clutching has-beens who's entire career is debasing alternative, potentially unorthodox, but fully plausible ideas simply due to those ideas potentially discrediting big names and thus damaging the ego and reputation of those in charge. It's fucking nasty.
@Usagi @matrix @josh
>In truth, the age of consent exists as a blanket to protect as many of those who are socially acknowledged as most vulnerable as possible
Can I see some historical evidence for this? A LOT of people say this, but that's just what they assume is the reason for the age of consent's existence, and there's a tremendous difference between what one thinks and the reality of things.

I've looked into the history of age of consent laws and protecting people was never a part of it. Well actually, it protected daughters as property of their parents, since taking a daughter's virginity without the father's consent was considered property damage to the father. Does that count as protecting people?
@matrix @josh we already have Romeo & Juliet laws in most states so a 17 year old with an 18 year old isn't illegal, single year or less than a year differences don't matter so much.

also we have the highest amount of jews outside of israel in this country so of course we're retarded about shit like this, kikes are constantly testing it.
@matrix @josh who else is constantly pushing for the normalization of pedophilia & child molestation, sir?
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh Weird, I always see the neonazis complain that marrying 13 year olds is white culture and the Jews are responsible for raising age of consent to 18 as part of their white genocide schemes.
@Alex @matrix @josh Those are retards, disinfo shills, agents, or jews pushing that.

The very reason we have an "Age of Consent" as law is due to kikery pushing boundaries. Law creation is almost always reactive, after all. Prior to such law existing we didn't usually have 30 year olds marrying 13 year olds, such people were usually lynched.

We also shamed pre-marital sex, even for men, then.

Meanwhile, in the Talmud, they had to figure out how to regulate their toddler rape because of how widespread it was in jewish communities (and probably still is).
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh So what you're saying is the reason the bible bans homosexuality is a reaction to all Christians being raging homosexuals who can't control their rampant cock-lust?
@Alex @matrix @josh I said *almost all* for a reason. Homosexuality is banned because it is part and parcel with pedophilia because a majority of homosexuals are homosexual because they were raped as a kid.

Oh, you're a homosexual. My condolences, you didn't have to go through that. Or you had unlimited access to the internet and psyopped yourself into being gay from too much exposure to degeneracy. Either way.
@lichelordgodfrey @Alex @matrix @josh
>Homosexuality is banned because it is part and parcel with pedophilia
Nigga what the fuck are you talking about?
>a majority of homosexuals are homosexual because they were raped as a kid
Source: my anal canal
>poa.st
Oh wait that explaisn it
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh Woah, hold up, let's just think this through for a second. Jews ban raping kids because Jews rape kids, according to you, and whites don't need to ban kids because whites don't rape kids. But whites need to ban homosexuality, because white homosexuals were raped as kids? Who's raping those kids, and if those kids are being raped, why wasn't raping kids banned instead of banning the alleged byproduct?
@Alex @matrix @josh No, they didn't ban it in the Talmud. Regulated doesn't mean banned. Specifically it states in the Talmud that if the girl in question is under the age of 3, it doesn't count.

Raping kids is banned as well, retard. Or, you know, they just lynch the guy.
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh But I thought white people didn't rape kids. Why would white people need to ban it?
@Alex @matrix @josh I said earlier that they lynched people who did that, doesn't mean it doesn't happen sometimes.
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh So when white people ban pedophilia it's just a thing that happens sometimes and doesn't mean anything, but when Jews ban pedophilia, it's a widespread issue and a sign that all Jews are pedophiles?
@Alex @matrix @josh >don't let kikes in your country
>pedophilia not a big issue, if you find a guy doing it just kill him
>retard nobles, later business magnates want the trade deals, usury, and mercantile connections and let them in
>it becomes a widespread problem
>have to specifically put down ages of consent now
>the jews, however, still do not really comply but hide it amongst themselves
>one of their main religious documents, the Talmud, explicitly allows it and even encourages it if the child is not jewish

that is the process
@lichelordgodfrey @matrix @josh Acquire some ideological consistency, like a white man, and then maybe I'll humor you with a response.

@lichelordgodfrey @josh @Alex >Prior to such law existing we didn't usually have 30 year olds marrying 13 year olds

Yes, yes you did

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.