FFMpeg wiki: "For source files of 1080p and 720p av1 optimization is not optimal, most of the time is better to go with the H265 for better vmaf/size ratio"

Here, av1 is 330mb, h265 is 620mb.

I used hardware acceleration for HEVC but I doubt it would make that much difference

@matrix

I used hardware acceleration for HEVC but I doubt it would make that much difference

it absolutely does. hardware encoders are pretty terrible.

Follow

@mia Yeah, you were right. I used the same CQ and it ended up with a similar quality and only 250mb, but it took 3h hours instead of 10 minutes and I used the slowest present on both.
I don't think hardware encoders are terrible, offline transcoding just isn't their intended use case.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 1

@matrix yup. should do better with CRF at similar size fwiw, at least that was the case with x264. CQP cripples rate control.

@mia Oh, thanks, it does much better. It's faster with quality closer to the av1 encode at only 180mb

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.