@ChristiJunior @HotPolishTakes The libertarian right to form cultural Marxist tech cartels for the purpose of censoring libertarians is also essential. For the record, I'm not opposed to libertarian solutions, as some of them may be useful. But if the easiest route to getting my enemies to fuck off is using the government to punch them in the face, I'm not gonna worry about "muh NAP" and try to concoct some free market solution to dissuade megacorps from promoting chemical castration of my children.

@ChristiJunior @HotPolishTakes "Nooo, you can't just shoot the bad guy, we can only stop him through tax cuts and deregulation!"

@ArdanianRight @ChristiJunior @HotPolishTakes Well maybe Facebook could be the exception because it was probably created by the government itself.

Also, many market anarchists support the idea of Redistribution. Basically any corporation that got its power by the state is illegitimate and therefore is open to mob rule.

https://c4ss.org/content/12961

@xianc78 @ChristiJunior @HotPolishTakes I mean the state is a factor in the creation, growth, and existence of every corporation, so what's the dividing line for too much government dependency?

@ArdanianRight @ChristiJunior @HotPolishTakes I would draw the line if they used the government to gain an unfair advantage through methods like subsidies, regulatory capture, eminent domain, bail-outs, etc. I would make exceptions for things that are used by every business like using a public service or "intellectual property".