The following should not be considered "AI slop":
* Text that was rough drafted by a human but was re-paraphrased by AI to sound better
* Otherwise human created images processed through AI filters (removing JPEG artifacts, noise reduction, enhanced lighting, colorization, etc)
* Basically all image to image generation if the input image was 100% human created
* Music played with one instrument (or group of instruments) then processed through a program like NeuralNote to create a MIDI file and have it played in a different instrument
* Any attempt to restore a vector image if only the rasterization is available
* Any attempt to recreate a 3D model that only has 2D images of it available
* Any attempt to restore original music whose only archive has other noises being played over it (e.g a song whose only existing presence is in a TV show but you want the original song without any of the other sounds playing over it)
* Websites and webpages that only used AI to generate HTML/CSS templates, but have everything else be human generated
* Scripts and configuration files that are not the core part of a program
* Source code that was 100% human created, but then sent through an LLM to clean up and refactor
* Source code that was 100% human created, but then sent through an LLM to be rewritten in a different language, use a different API/library/framework, or be ported to a different platform
* Programs that were 100% human written, but compiled through a vibe-coded compiler
* Images, sounds, videos, etc that were 100% human generated, but were done so using a vibe-coded program
* Video games, movies, TV shows, etc that only have a minuscule amount of AI generated assets (e.g the author had to find a certain sound effect but couldn't and doesn't have the means to generate it traditionally, so he had to use AI to make one)
* Any work whose only AI generated thing is the character/location names
* Any story whose setting was AI generated but the plot is human created
* Any story that used AI to help the author find inspiration when he/she had writer's block
* Any game whose mechanics were (partially) came up with by AI when the developers were suffering from writer's block
* Any work whose only AI generated asset is the fucking logo
* Any company, organization, etc that uses an AI generated logo and nothing more
IT'S FINALLY OUT!!!
My first commercial game and my first game under the Ioncom brand. It's an action, roguelite, dungeon-crawler with limited lives and permadeath.
It's currently Linux exclusive, but the source code is available and you should be able to compile it for anything that SFML runs on.
https://ioncominteractive.itch.io/refractored-depths
#gamedev #gamedevelopment #gaming #indiegames #indie #indiedev #videogames
I have a lot of ideas when it comes to worldbuilding. I have always been a fan of science fantasy (combining both tropes from sci-fi and fantasy), but I feel like most works haven't embraced both genres to their fullest potential. The original Phantasy Star series is probably the closest because they weren't afraid to actually call magic "magic" instead of "the force" like in Star Wars.
I plan on using these ideas for my dream game (or series), but I'm posting these worldbuilding concepts anyway just in case I never get to creating the game, and I just don't care if other people use these ideas. They most likely have already been done before (in fact I know some of these ideas have been done before). I'm using AI to generate these concepts because I suck at drawing.
Anyway let's begin. First off, I think alien worlds should combine both ancient technology, futuristic technology, and everything in between. Technological progress isn't a linear path, so you shouldn't assume that aliens go through the same technological progression as we do. They might be flying interstellar ships, but they might also still be wielding swords and bows. So you can have spaceships flying over medieval style villages or even mudhuts. Star Wars has basically already popularized this, so this should be a no-brainer, but you can always take it a step further. For example, replace lightsabers with steel swords while still having space travel.
Yeah, and it's totally 100% the AI bros fault. We extremely closed minded, narcissistic, highly opinionated software devs who will intentionally break functionality in software over petty drama have absolutely nothing to do with the decline of software development and haven't at all destroy any appeal of code bases having 100% (or at least mostly) human generated code or software that doesn't include AI integration whatsoever.
IT’S LIVE!
I finally got myself a dedicated self-hosted blog.
Which I should have done years ago. But now I’ve done it today. And frankly, this is a relief.
「ChatGPT has now a big problem.
Researchers at Oxford exposed a massive threat to large language models.”
It’s called "Model Collapse."
And it explains why the internet is about to become a toxic waste dump for Large Language Models.
Right now, AI companies are scraping the entire web to train their next-generation models.
But there’s a massive problem.
The internet is no longer just human data. It is rapidly filling up with AI-generated text, images, and code.
What happens when an AI trains on data generated by another AI?
A new paper in Nature just gave us the answer. And it is terrifying.
When AI models are recursively trained on AI-generated data, they suffer from irreversible brain damage.
The researchers found that the model starts forgetting the "tails" of the original data distribution. The rare, weird, unique, and complex human nuances completely disappear.
It's like making a photocopy of a photocopy.
Every generation loses resolution. The output gets flatter, blander, and more generic, until the model completely collapses in on itself.
For years, we thought the biggest bottleneck for AI was compute, getting enough H100 GPUs from Nvidia.
This paper proves the real bottleneck is us.
If we keep flooding the internet with synthetic AI slop, we will poison the very data pool required to build smarter models.
The ultimate irony? We thought AI was going to make human creators obsolete.
Instead, this research proves that verified, genuine human data is about to become the most valuable commodity in the tech industry.」
x.com/CrazyShyyt/status/2118178862823874924
「だからいったじゃーん、のお気持ち。
まあ止めようと思って止められる流れではなかっただろうが…」
x.com/tukimi_negitoro/status/2118330380382253238
@lain@lain.com Another episode in the GNU cancel campaign using out of context quotations from a mailing list.
Someone asked a hypothetical "Would you accept a contribution if it was made using slave labour?" and the maintainer said "Yes".
That doesn't mean they endorse slavery, which is how a lot of people misunderstand it. It just means they don't care who wrote the code as long as it is free software, which is quite reasonable.
Also if you're one of those people who post that one screenshot that only includes the "Our answer must be YES." out of context without Eliz' actual reasoning included then you are an extremely disingenuous person.
I see Eliz' post on the emacs-devel mailing list is going viral on Fedi. context
I just want to say that people who criticize this post fundamentally misunderstand the free software movement.
In my eyes I see that a lot of newgens see "free software" more as an "ethical consumption" label like "fairtrade", "organic", "cruelty free", etc. That's not what this movement is.
The free software movement sees source code as research. And good researchers do not ignore facts even if they were found by unethical experiments. They only care about getting the facts.
@aeva@mastodon.gamedev.place Your long time criticism of the free software movement is... that it doesn't solve every problem with humanity ever but instead narrows down its scope to stay in its own lane? Huh?