@waltercool @icedquinn is it rlly Hegelianism tho? that shid is super tricky to wrap ur head around, even for philosophy otakus like me
U had Max Stirner who was a young hegelian who ended up rejecting all the other young hegelians.
but like yeah, anyone who favours central planning is an idiot, thats an easy one. but for me, what makes these specific kinds of people idiots is the support for structuralism/high modernism, secular humanism, historical materialism, class essentialism etc.

idk enough about the right tho... is there such a thing as "post-right"? do u guys get structuralists over there as well?

@cee @icedquinn I mean, in overall central planning it's a kind of Hegelian. The "one solution/truth" for everyone.

They believe there is an objective and rational solution for everyone, ignoring a very fundamental principle used by Praxeology, humans are complex and quite irrational. Whatever works for you, may not work for me, and that's fine.

@waltercool @cee central planning economies fail because they can't deal with caprice,

hayek's argument is they move to suppress it to make people manageable.

@waltercool @cee taleb's is basically that capitalism is better because it allows people to privatize the risk of doing unknowns and since most unknowns fail it contains the failure (while society still eventually gets to partake in the winners.)

central planners think they know everything, then they sell decades of oil futures which goes down ten cents and venezuela collapses.