@waltercool@pl.slash.cl
That's true as well. Not just because electronic vote/counting is always bad idea, but also because it's always the Douche and Turd vote.
@xianc78 @waltercool Paper voting is equally fake, they're making it more obvious than ever worldwide even.
Stalin was right in this regard: "it's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes that really count".
As for having to choose between basically the same faggot, this too is the same in every single country.
Voting is basically choosing between eating brown diarrhea, or eating rainbow colored diarrhea.
At the end of the day you'll still be eating diarrhea regardless of what you "choose", but at least you can customize the appearance.
Stalin was right in this regard: "it's not who votes that counts, it's who counts the votes that really count".
As for having to choose between basically the same faggot, this too is the same in every single country.
Voting is basically choosing between eating brown diarrhea, or eating rainbow colored diarrhea.
At the end of the day you'll still be eating diarrhea regardless of what you "choose", but at least you can customize the appearance.
@ryo @xianc78 That's why you must have access to vote counting
IDK at other countries, but at mine the entire process can be audited by selected people from every coalition, also counting is public access (anyone can be there) with public exposure of each vote.
Each vote can be disputed if needed by auditors and reviewed by a committee.
When you have restricted access to the process or made by machine, yeah, it's retarded
IDK at other countries, but at mine the entire process can be audited by selected people from every coalition, also counting is public access (anyone can be there) with public exposure of each vote.
Each vote can be disputed if needed by auditors and reviewed by a committee.
When you have restricted access to the process or made by machine, yeah, it's retarded
@waltercool @xianc78
> can be audited by selected people from every coalition
Here's one of the problems then.
> also counting is public access (anyone can be there) with public exposure of each vote
Oh, that's better.
> can be audited by selected people from every coalition
Here's one of the problems then.
> also counting is public access (anyone can be there) with public exposure of each vote
Oh, that's better.
@ryo @waltercool You will never elect these guys out of existence.
