Follow

So people are saying that Klaus Schwab's replacement is even worse. I obviously don't think he's any better and he could be worse, but people are pointing out that he used to work at Nestle and openly said that water should be a commodity and not a human right.

Thing is, that is already the case right now. Unless you have access to a well or a rain bucket or are willing to drink water straight from a pond or river, you are already paying for water either in the form of a water bill or just straight up paying for water bottles.

It is literally impossible to monopolize water even with an artificial monopoly. Even if they somehow make rain collecting and wells illegal worldwide, I bet their will be mass disobedience. The only way they could get away with it is probably through geoengineering and making it rain in certain locations, but that can severely back fire on them.

· · Web · 1 · 0 · 3
Not only that, but what kind of meaningful future is there for the WEF anyway? The whole Euro/Washington/Coastal consensus is out the door, replaced by a Nationalist/Industrialist consortium - so what's the point of Davos anyway?

@cjd To me, it was always just a public facing front for the Bilderberg Group. I feel like it can easily be replaced.

Yeah, but Bilderberg isn't really a power center either, the power is in the people and families who may or may not be in attendance.

Events like Bilderberg or Davos are opportunities for representatives of power families to get together, chum it up, and find some kind of common ground which MIGHT lead to them working together.

"Might" => because they don't generally trust each other that much.
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.