@SuperDicq They also don't realize that GNU Taler (what many anti-crypto activists propose as an "ethical alternative" to crypto) also uses proof-of-work.
@SuperDicq I thought it was.
And how does it secure itself?
@CapitalB@noauthority.social @xianc78@gameliberty.club Transactions are done using blind signatures through an exchange (usually a bank or payment provider).
Ahwas, so sanctioned countries dont work?
@CapitalB@noauthority.social @xianc78@gameliberty.club Taler is specifically designed to not allow you to do illegal things with your money such as tax evasion (which includes avoiding sanctions). It is meant for business transactions.
You should see Taler as a free software replacement for something like MasterCard or Visa. It's a payment system so the money still goes from bank to bank.
Cryptocurrency (in general) on the other hand is more like digital cash. Anonymous and freely exchanged between anyone without a middleman. So I think cryptocurrency still has a good usecase, such as this.
@icedquinn@blob.cat @CapitalB@noauthority.social @xianc78@gameliberty.club And what exactly do you think a MasterCard transaction is?
@icedquinn@blob.cat @xianc78@gameliberty.club @CapitalB@noauthority.social No, the credit account is at your bank. MasterCard just handles the transactions and issues the cards.
@SuperDicq @xianc78 @CapitalB One could argue that the security of blind signatures is based on proof of work (in theory they can be bruteforced), but that would be silly as it would apply to all cryptography other than one-time pads.
@xianc78@gameliberty.club Nope, Taler is just a payment system not a currency. A lot of people have this misconception.