By my standard, he has pedophilic tendencies because he likes loli.
Just like you have pedophilic tendencies because you like loli.
Just like I have pedophilic tendencies because I like loli.
In fact, you're I think the one who argued that "minors" can consent to sex or that at the very least you found Emma Watson most attractive when she was 15.
So, in that sense, by your own standards, you're on the same level as he is.
Hahahahahahahahaha
What a response hahahaha
You ARE a pedonigger, pedonigger hahahahaha
You want to "woodchipper" people who say "minors" can be hot, yet you also fucking say "minors" are hot.
You need to take a moment to think long and hard (pun intended) about your own attractions. Clearly you haven't done so, up until now.
Hahahahahaha you're trying to use the arguments I make all the time against me. Sad! Pathetic, even.
You're the one living in America, you dolt. If you call yourself a "White Nationalist" then you're either living in America or basically LARP like an American. It's practically a dead giveaway.
15 is a "minor" over there. Ergo, you think minors are hot.
Fucking hell, recently people are getting beaten in public for dating 17 year olds. They call someone who is 23 dating an 18 year old a "pedo"! You guys need to get a grip, and stop demanding every country around the world follows your stupid moralfag codes. It is destroying society.
Once again, YOU ARE ALSO the lolicon pedonigger who everyone also wants to "woodchipper", idiot. You jack off to cartoons of prepubescent children.
No amount of "b....b....but I don't like real-life pedos!!!! l...l....lllooooook i.....i....i made posts on social media....P....Please!!! I only jerk it to cartoons, it's totally not an attraction to children!!!!!" will stop them thinking the way they do.
You are pathetic, but I've repeated that so many times in this thread.
@William_The_Dragonborn @ChristiJunior
I didn't block .poast. I got individually "defederated" by them.
I don't block anyone.
And I'm interacting with you right now.
Lol
Did you not read?
You're either living in America or LARPing as one. There is no fundamental difference between the two for me. Being an American is nowadays a state of mind. Shopping mall nation.
Do you think telling people "I'm not a pedo, I just think the AOC should be 14 and I jerk to lolicon porn" is going to make them think "oh this guy totally doesn't need the woodchipper, he's cool" when they want to murder people for dating a 16 year old?
Jesus fucking Christ.
@ChristiJunior loloolololololololololool
You don't know what a LARP is. Your arguments are taken straight from American WN and "el goblino" Nazis.
So let me get this straight.
Let's just ignore the lolicon which is obviously a way to scratch the pedophilic attraction itch.
You argue that 14 should be the AOC.
So, you support hebephiles?
You're pro-hebephilia but just not pro-pedophilia.
Do you know how much "CSAM" is of 14-17 year olds?
Uh oh spaghettioes...
Just in case you don't believe me.
https://info.thorn.org/hubfs/Research/08112020_SG-CSAM_AttitudesExperiences-Report_2019.pdf
"Girls aged 13–17 are more than four times as likely to say sharing nudes is normal for their age (39% agree), as girls who are 9–12 (10% agree). Similarly, boys aged 13–17 are more than two times as likely to say sharing nudes is normal for their age (38% agree), as are boys aged 9–12 (16% agree)"
So let me understand here.
You jack off to cartoon pictures of little girls, but it TOTALLY IS NOT AT ALL IN ANY WAY based on an attraction to little girls (real or imagined).
Nah, you're just...Uh....Appreciating art or something.
And the majority of "CSAM" is not actually bought or sold. A fraction of it is "traded", but the vast majority is acquired for free.
Not to mention "self-generated" stuff published among 13-17 year olds, which makes up a whopping 50+ % of all "CSAM".
Give it a break man.
You haven't done any research on this, clearly.
I'm not denying my attractions.
I don't get the point you're making.
I am being totally open and honest.
You're the one contorting yourself into saying your attractions are not what they obviously are, because you're afraid of how society would react. Which in of itself just shows how weak you actually are.
Then why don't you stop responding to them like a little bitchboy?
And you clearly are contorting yourself by insisting that lolicon is not anything to do with a pedophilic attraction, which was your original argument.
How about you stick to detroitcity or get those guys to "defederate" little old me like Poast did? Maybe you'd spend less effort trying to "pointing out" stuff for me.
Oh wow, what a great "own"!
I am totally defeated.
Can you guys stop being so fucking pathetic?
Trick question, I know you can't.
I'm not saying you can't, I'm just saying it's stupid, retarded, in fact. I'm saying it's smarter to just not reply to my comment if you're just going to say "retard" over and over again like a 2015 era Facebook "troll".
You spamming "retard" is what an actual <100 IQ retard would do.
How am I wasting everyone's time when I am the original poster and you're not even from this fucking instance?
Ah yes, because posting "retard" takes up fewer words, it's "more succinct". You argue like you're still a fucking teenager.
YOU are the one who came to my post, commented "retard" repeatedly, and are now trying to do an "uno reverse" on me saying that I am the one wasting people's time, ON MY OWN POST.
I didn't say "cartoons are children". I said the attraction is the same. You are not attracted to cartoons. You are attracted to cartoon children. Jfc, moron.
I never said "7 and 17 are the same", that was Christijunior who just made a strawman.
Fucking hell.
Lol
I defended his position because it was ideologically consistent. I didn't defend him as a person.
I defended him having lolicon. Just as I would defend you having lolicon.
Now you're strawmanning again.
I didn't say "cartoons = pedophilia". I said being attracted to cartoon children denotes a pedophilic attraction (because you are attracted to cartoon CHILDREN). Are you saying that you like the fantasy of sex with children in a cartoon setting but that it doesn't come from any attraction whatsoever. Why are you jacking off to the pictures then?
Right-wingers are the people going out and beating people in public for dating 16 year olds you fucking moron! I made a post about "pedo-hunters" who were all WN types who went out and literally hospitalized a "minor" because they THOUGHT he was a pedo.
You do realize that earlier Christijunior was arguing that 14 should be the AOC, right? How do you feel about that?
> "very shitty debate rn"
Fuck off.
It is not a "divine law". That is utter bull. You know it.
I live in a country that only a few decades ago had the AOC as 14, and before then it was 12. All this in the 20th century.
"Power dynamic". Shut up.
Loooooooooooooooooool you're against Leo Di Cap having consensual relations with a 20 year old! OH MY FUCKING GOD, and you deny right-wing hysteria!
Holy fucking shit.
"Nuance". This is the opposite of nuance. This is you trying to create a favorable position for yourself only, because you are still young.
"Cute anime girls kissing". HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
Yeah, the loli porn that people post here is just "cute anime girls kissing". Holy fucking shit. You are such a tool.
> "I didn't even read your response"
> "KYS"
Ah yes......
I'm a visual learner, so please, you first.
@Noraweed @ChristiJunior @Suzu
I bet I'm more European (White) than you are you fucktard.
@Noraweed @ChristiJunior @Suzu
Why are you mixed-race LARPing like a European?
@Noraweed @ChristiJunior @Suzu
I'm European, fuckwit. I've literally posted physique, unlike 90% of people here.