Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
The Anglo-American control over people's children is such a despicable thing.
Every "online safety law" that's ever been passed is based on Anglo-American Puritan morality.
Every single one.
They go around the world forcing people to adopt their stupid prudish restrictive "sex is the worst thing ever!" customs.
The irony is that "online sex crimes" are rising exponentially, year after year after year after year BECAUSE of this puritanical lunacy.
"A spokesperson for the regulator, Ofcom, said the measures were "encouraging", but added "tech companies will have to do a lot more in the coming months to protect children online"."
Everytime they say "protect children online", you can guarantee that there is some sort of insane restriction coming.
The whole point of "social-gaming" is that you have friends to game with.
Banning them from talking to friends while playing a game is going to push them into more dangerous areas where there aren't such ludicrous restrictions.
Fucking shit, this is so obvious.
Do any of these fucking idiots have children? Do they remember their own childhood? Do they even care about children?
We all know they don't care about children at all. They care more about money and making up new "rules".
"Assimilationism" is the exact type of "Globalism" shit that right-wing White Nationalist "conspiracy theorist" types rail about non-stop.
It is the destruction of difference. It is the direct negation of "separate, but equal".
Yet they paradoxically say shit like "if you come here, you have to become [insert nationality]" or "why did you come here if you aren't [insert religion]?" etc... etc...
Teddy Roosevelt once said that he was fine with anyone coming to America, as long as they became "American" and discarded any former identity.
Teddy Roosevelt was also a globalist imperialist who wanted a (White) American Empire (even if he was relatively benevolent in its application).
"Assimilationism" is the policy of expansionist supremacist Empire. And, just like with Rome, it plays a major part in the host's downfall. The original citizens grow decadent, self-obsessed and aloof, while the "new citizens" become agitated by obvious lies, discrimination and their use as fodder for never-ending imperialist designs.
https://blog.oup.com/2021/09/an-empire-of-many-colours-race-and-imperialism-in-ancient-rome/
Even the United States military understands this:
This is literally a West Point article.
Assimilationism doesn't work. It doesn't matter how much you try to force it, or gatekeep to achieve it, or gaslight etc...
It will never work, in any field.
Those who want to assimilate are the equivalent of a slave wanting preferential treatment from their masters by turning in "rebellious" (i.e. they are not under the strict control of the master) compatriots. They are Steven, from "Django Unchained". They are cowardly, hypocritical, opportunistic, weak-willed, sadistic, narcissistic, misguided and simple.
Their slavish behavior does not even lead to their master actually treating them better. It just leads to their master being content that they have divided yet another group ("divide and conquer") and prevented people from uniting against them. The assimilationist therefore aids in keeping people in bondage, not freeing them. They end up justifying their own abuse. It's Stockholm Syndrome.
The solution is and arguably has always been integrationism, not assimilationism.
The reason assimilationists hate integration is that it presupposes that they have to treat the "out-group" as equals to the host/majoritiy.
Of course, there's an irony there, because everyone in the West (left and right, top and bottom, "conservative" and "liberal") loves saying "all men are created equal". That's kinda been the whole point of "Western civilization" for hundreds of years (even if it hasn't been properly applied).
So assimilationists are not only Stephen from "Django Unchained", but they are the Pigs from "Animal Farm"; "some animals are more equal than others".
The entire premise of "assimilationism" is rooted in lies and hypocrisy and an ignorance of their own civilizations' founding principles. This is why it fails, and why, the more people try to push it, the worse the situation gets.
Randy Fine says "the streets of Gaza should run red with Palestinian blood" - I sleep
A protester says "Israel is gay" - Real shit
Meanwhile, the Trump-supported "MAGA" Republican who won Florida (by a smaller margin than previous elections) says that anyone who criticizes Israel should get 5 years in jail, of course, this being a direct infringement on the 1st Amendment, the thing that Trump says he is defending.
"You'll get tired of winning!"
Elon Musk tried to win Wisconsin's election by:
1.) Open Bribery (while simultaneously calling-out George Soros, lol)
2.) Ponzi Scheme
And he still lost.
What a fucking idiot loser bitch-boy.
I think this year will see the rolling back of Anglo-American thought-hegemony.
People will realize that it's all just hypocrisy and lies. There is nothing to it aside from trying to get a one-up on your own brothers. It's not about "liberty", unless that "liberty" was the "liberty to exploit your fellow man for a penny more".
This shit is like the plot of MGSV, except instead of the English language, it's about English thought.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=saxI0Zu1ABI&ab_channel=Amitush
It's no surprise that Sargon inevitably devolved into a caricature of "Lockeanism" (which he doesn't even understand).
> Racist, but denies it
> C(r)apitalist. Hates any aspect of socialism
> Wants the British Empire back
> Wants to subjugate others
> LARPs like a great thinker
> Hates the Enlightenment and the ideas of the French Revolution
> Simultaneously claims to be "liberal" or "Classical Liberal"
Fuck, I broke my pledge to make April fools this year just about joking about not being a pedo....
Oh well.
British "liberal" philosophers be like "Ahhhh, Napoleon brought slavery back to Haiti!!!!! Napoleon talked about a "White, European race"!! See?!?!?! He's eeeeeevil!!!!"
Also British "liberals": "The niggers and the Amerindians and the Indians etc... etc... are cockroaches under our boot. We should exploit their labor for our own purposes. Hail the White European Race! This is true "noble" liberalism! The World is ours to play with! We are the master-race!"
The only Brit worth any respect in this regard (for being open and relatively consistent about the true tennents of his philosophy) was Carlyle. He supported slavery and imperialism, was openly racist to a degree that even other racist philosophers were freaked out by him, refused to change or aknowledge that change could be good for society, and generally was a curmudgeon (although a very articulate and witty one).
One of the greatest mistakes of all time was American thinkers siding with the British (their literal enemies only a few decades prior) instead of the French (some of their closest historical allies, and those from whom they drew inspiration for their own revolution).
"“The people had said there was something higher than work, more precious than cotton…it was right, and liberty, and doing justice, and bidding defiance to all wrong.”" - THIS is the difference between materialistic obsession with money/property and true, higher, spiritual, human values.
https://fpif.org/the-lockean-roots-of-white-supremacy-in-the-u-s/
I don't have pedophilic tendencies.
Barbell ab rollouts are GOATed.
Go around Europe. In fact, go around the world.
Everyone knows about French or German philosophers. They are the greatest philosophers Europe ever produced.
No one cares about "the Austrian school" (popularized by an Austrian who became a British citizen, surprise surprise) or Lockean or Burkean economics.
The whole "British liberal philosopher" thing is a LARP. It's a big fucking LARP.
They complain about the "French Empire spreading democracy" while literally wanting the British Empire to expand to cover the entire world and turn everyone into cashcows.
I've got it now.
The difference between Anglo and Continental understandings of "liberalism" is quite simple.
The Anglo understanding is: "I want to be able to have slaves, and to exploit them and get lots of money"
The Continental understanding is: "I want to be able to fuck kids and jack off in public"
https://newdirection.online/2018-publications-pdf/ND-Report-ConsFreeMarket-preview%28low-res%29.pdf
"...the French Revolution, leading to terror and then to Napoleon’s military coup and war in Europe, scarcely can be considered a success..."
"Hoppe envisions the French Revolution as the crucial collapse of the foundations of property rights in Europe. In these works and numerous articles, Hoppe elaborates on theme of the aggressive and acquisitive nature of the republican democracies that followed. Hence, his chief historical moment of truth is the shift beginning with the French Revolution. In Hoppe’s view, the old aristocratic order of Europe and to some extent the European monarchies emerging in the Middle Ages were hardly ideal forms, but as “owners” of their their territories or their realms, monarchs tended to operate with very low time preference. They were looking above all for the continuation of their realms (and their dynasties) into the future."
The Mises institute says that they're basically against the French Revolution because it led to an Empire that tried spreading the Enlightenment via force.
Right before that, they quote Hoppe saying that the Imperialist European Monarchs were actually good people because they respected "property rights" (i.e. the rights of them to treat their population as slaves).
You couldn't make this shit up.
And they start their article by saying evaluating the French Revolution is a "Rorschach Test for educated people", lol
https://mises.org/mises-wire/was-french-revolution-good-or-bad
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
