This is what an overreliance on AI will create:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1BQPV-iCkU&t=18s&ab_channel=PassivelySedentary
A few weeks ago I had a phone conversation with a friend of mine, and the subject of AI came up.
We both found it funny that university students now are using AI to write their weekly reading-reports or to help with their theses.
In our day, you actually had to do the research yourself. You had to spend time reading things, learning things, thinking for yourself etc...
Nowadays, none of that is really necessary. If you have a good enough AI program, you can get it to write your papers for you and then all you have to do is make slight aesthetic edits to it to make it seem like it was written by a human.
AI is basically making people dumb. It is eliminating our capacity for cognition by outsourcing it to a robot.
I'm not saying all AI is 100% bad, but the overreliance on it to "do all the work" as of late is deeply worrying.
I use AI for porn or to write a letter of motivation for a job application. That is penuts compared to using it for writing research papers or using it to help "win" wars.
Best recent example is the claim that the Obummer Iran nuclear (which Trump unilaterally pulled out of in 2018, leading Iran to go against the IAEA) deal was bad but Trump's Iran nuclear deal is good.
Deciding whether to post a low-quality post-workout photo in order to show detractors that I actually do work out (unlike them).
Should I post it to begin with?
Should I even post it today instead of waiting for tomorrow so I can post back photos alongside?
I'm not going to be able to sleep because I'm ruminating over such important issues....
My irl friends have sometimes told me that I'm "brave" or show "courage" for speaking my mind almost all of the time, but I interpret that pessimistically.
If I'm considered "brave" or "courageous" by my best friends, with chiseled jawlines, blonde and blue-eyed, 6 ft 4, full Aryan ubermensch phenotype, work in government, have shaken hands with Prime Ministers and Presidents etc... then what does that say about what "bravery" or "courage" is in the modern-day?
"Bravery", "courage", "honor", "honesty"...
Following these virtues is a punishment in of itself regardless of whether it's related to my thoughts about sexuality specifically or just my other everyday thoughts...
I think I should remind (again) everyone from the "Para" community who views, likes and/or shares my content, I was not always this way.
In fact, I was quite a strong "anti", although this became more muted once I started watching loli porn and came to terms with my sexuality and my own life. I still was "in the closet" for a while, and then became a "morality police" sort of guy. Only now do I see how I was still wrong at all those stages.
There are people on F/Pedi and in other places who I attacked in the past, and I want to apologize to them but obviously I don't want to name them (for their safety, not for mine).
Of course, no apology on my part will be enough. I can't turn back time; I can't remove the pain I may have caused.
I guess this is a reason I let some people from these communities follow me but most not, and I rarely if ever follow people back.
The only thing I can say is that I try to be more level-headed now. I try not to be knee-jerk. I try to understand people. I'm trying to rekindle my empathetic side, although I still can get angry and go on the offensive against people (especially those who remind me of my past self).
I'm not asking people to forgive me. I'm just saying that I apologize.
In a strange sort of way, I think I deserve "punishment", but not in a conventional way. This is probably why I just post everything in public. It's just something that I have to do. My "punishment" is to be attacked by people who I would have considered "allies" only a few years ago. My "punishment" is to fight my demons out in the open.
I've come to the conclusion that "Pedos"/"MAP"s do more to promote and protect true freedom than anyone else.
This is why they are despised.
Because they promote actual freedom (of thought, of love, of action) from the repressive system, and not compromise "freedom" within said system.
They remind everyone else that they are shackled to archaic, at best corrupted and at worst completely false moralizing systems of control.
Every time a group (racial, religious, ethnic, sexual etc...) compromises with the system to get its "freedom", it ends up being the "freedom" to live on a reservation, with the population "controlled".
No compromises with this oppressive system! Assimilationism is not the answer, but integration! Assimilation involves cutting out one's own identity, integration involves championing one's identity.
This system deserves to be defeated, in totality.
Then, and only then, can the hand of mercy be extended to the defeated adversaries like Alexander the Great did with the defeated Persians.
ZEUS BE WITH US!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4XfV0vdMAA&ab_channel=BigBOSS
I don't get how posting a non-nude video of a girl doing a cartwheel, taken in the U.S. (Utah) is somehow "violating U.S. law" or "violating community guidelines" or "promoting criminality" or......"Spam"...
Months ago I posted pictures of children holding Hezbollah flags with the word "lgf" in the post, and it was taken down for "sexualizing children" (what?). It was then put back up.
Is the "rule" that you can't post any pictures/videos of children ever, never, ever, even if they're non-nude and even if the context in the video/picture is not sexual at all, because SOMEONE MIGHT think "wow, cute/hot"?
Just say it then. Stop giving me these weaksauce excuses and/or deflections.
One of the most ridiculous things I see argued by "right-wing lolicons" is that lolicon ISN'T pedophilia, but toddlercon IS pedophilia.
They argue about art-style, even though the art-style in most cases is the exact same. Heck, many times it's the same artist drawing both (especially regarding Japanese artists).
They argue about "realism", even though once again this is shared by both toddlercon and lolicon and is more-so a lolicon thing to begin with. Artists are getting better, and there's also AI, and 3DCG is a thing, and there's definitely more 3DCG lolicon than there is 3DCG toddlercon.
They say it's because of the age of the subject being drawn, but that also doesn't make any sense considering lolicon is about prepubescent girls 90% of the time.
These arguments just don't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny.
I don't know man, whatever...