Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
Women's rights and reproductive education is eugenics. There simply is no counter to this. Margeret Sanger was a eugenecist. Feminism is eugenics. Progressivism is, in a way, eugenics.
This paper makes that clear.
However, eugenics aside, once/if the "target universal education by 2030" is reached, you still have to maintain population levels.
What do we do then?
Orphan Nation?
Total Nuclear Family Destruction?
5th-Wave Feminism?
Breaking the "Egg Wall"?
I used to say "I'm racist against anti-racists" or "anti-racism is code for anti-white" when I was in my "Alt-Right" adjacent/"pro-white" phase.
Nowadays, I'm more inclined to say "I'm racist against racists", which I think is a more correct, consistent and based opinion.
Many things that this graph shows.
1.) FDR/Truman progressive "New Deal" policies gave the U.S. the highest economic growth it ever saw. No Republican or Democrat "neoliberal" or otherwise ever comes close.
2.) The economy under Republicans generally tends to fall during their second terms (if they get one). Furthermore, the growth that they experience in their first terms is also generally dwarfed by their Democrat successor in their first term.
3.) Democrats generally do better on the economy in their second term (if they get one). There is no fall-off.
4.) The economic growth observed under Democrat administrations during the "neoliberal" era is most likely less due to deregulation and more due to raising taxes on the wealthy and investing in social services.
During the FDR/Truman era, taxes on the wealthy were very high, and the investing in social services/protections for workers was also very high. The economy had very high levels of growth.
While there was growth in the Clinton/Obama eras, there possibly could have been more if they were even more progressive.
In fact, some argue that Bill Clinton's deregulations (championed by right-wing economists and hated by progressive "New Deal"'ers) directly helped facilitate the recession of '07-'09 (which itself occured under Bush's second term mismanagement).
Tl;Dr: Keynes was right.
Keyenes also was bi and liked people on the younger side. Wow! Pedos getting tired of winning here...
Even though it's impossible to deny it, Sky News wants to instill doubt in the viewer over whether it was actually the IDF who butchered the medics...
Video obtained from Palestinian medics shows that:
1.) The Red Crescent vans were clearly marked, and all of them had their lights on
2.) Paramedics on the ground all were wearing reflective clothing (denoting that they were civilian medics)
3.) There were no armed Hamas fighters present
Literally every single thing the IDF said about this incident is a lie. The video shows that.
You can clearly hear the cries of the victims at the end.
There was only 1 confirmed survivor.
The IDF drove up to the site, gathered 15 bodies together and then dug a shallow pit and dumped them in it before covering it with a few cm of sand and driving off.
It's crazy how nowadays there's almost no difference between the "mainstream" "Jordan Peterson" "centrist" "Dark-Enlightenment" "Respectable" people and "Alt-Right" hangers-on.
These posts were made just 2 hours apart.
The "Alt-Right" can no longer call itself "dissident" any more.
The military situation in Libya makes the war in Syria look like child's play.
No wonder there is no resolution.
I'm not a "free market"ist. The "free market" can go to hell.
But this new "universal tariffs" plan is just stupid.
Tariffs, by their very nature, are not meant to be applied universally. They are meant to be targetted.
It would have made sense if tariffs were applied to China, and then these were offset by closer trade with Europe.
"Tariffs have been part of U.S. trade policy since the founding, but in the period that tariffs were high, they were consistent and targeted. There is little historical precedent for this sort of rapid experimentation in tariff-setting, where tariffs are declared one day and dropped the next, or applied to all products from a country."
Instead, Trump gave the middle finger to everyone (except North Korea, Afghanistan and Russia -surprise, surprise), which means American losses due to restricting their access to Chinese goods won't be recuperated because no one else will be willing to help because they've been fucking tariffed as well.
Double-irony is that now Asian markets are being forced to get closer to China in response, to protect their own economies. The United States spent literally half a century trying to get these markets to link with the American one. And now all that is in the trash.
Man, Trump is a fucking idiot. Honestly, Biden is more cognicent...
The other day he was talking about "Signalgate" and said that he thought the whole issue was about "phone signal". He fucking said that Baron Trump was a prodigy because he "learned how to switch on his laptop.
Ironic lolicons (i.e. Westerners) trying to gatekeep "their" medium (it's not theirs) from minors/MAPs etc... are like porn sites putting the "are you 18 or over?" confirmation on their shit.
Totally impotent.
I remember watching porn when I was like 11 years old.
Assimilationism doesn't work. It doesn't matter how much you try to force it, or gatekeep to achieve it, or gaslight etc...
It will never work, in any field.
Those who want to assimilate are the equivalent of a slave wanting preferential treatment from their masters by turning in "rebellious" (i.e. they are not under the strict control of the master) compatriots. They are Steven, from "Django Unchained". They are cowardly, hypocritical, opportunistic, weak-willed, sadistic, narcissistic, misguided and simple.
Their slavish behavior does not even lead to their master actually treating them better. It just leads to their master being content that they have divided yet another group ("divide and conquer") and prevented people from uniting against them. The assimilationist therefore aids in keeping people in bondage, not freeing them. They end up justifying their own abuse. It's Stockholm Syndrome.
The solution is and arguably has always been integrationism, not assimilationism.
The reason assimilationists hate integration is that it presupposes that they have to treat the "out-group" as equals to the host/majoritiy.
Of course, there's an irony there, because everyone in the West (left and right, top and bottom, "conservative" and "liberal") loves saying "all men are created equal". That's kinda been the whole point of "Western civilization" for hundreds of years (even if it hasn't been properly applied).
So assimilationists are not only Stephen from "Django Unchained", but they are the Pigs from "Animal Farm"; "some animals are more equal than others".
The entire premise of "assimilationism" is rooted in lies and hypocrisy and an ignorance of their own civilizations' founding principles. This is why it fails, and why, the more people try to push it, the worse the situation gets.
Randy Fine says "the streets of Gaza should run red with Palestinian blood" - I sleep
A protester says "Israel is gay" - Real shit
Elon Musk tried to win Wisconsin's election by:
1.) Open Bribery (while simultaneously calling-out George Soros, lol)
2.) Ponzi Scheme
And he still lost.
What a fucking idiot loser bitch-boy.
It's no surprise that Sargon inevitably devolved into a caricature of "Lockeanism" (which he doesn't even understand).
> Racist, but denies it
> C(r)apitalist. Hates any aspect of socialism
> Wants the British Empire back
> Wants to subjugate others
> LARPs like a great thinker
> Hates the Enlightenment and the ideas of the French Revolution
> Simultaneously claims to be "liberal" or "Classical Liberal"
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
