Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club

@Consuela

I don't normally comment outside my instance, but I felt the need to comment on this post.

Congrats!

And I hope she learns her lesson (and perhaps repents and becomes an "ally", or maybe that's too much to hope for...).

The law actually CAN work for people after all...

In the example of the "Pale of Settlement", life in the area was bad, but "Jewish identity" and "Yiddish culture" flourished due to the hardships.

"Integration", when applied to Jews, makes them into proto-nationalists. They see themselves as "different", just as the people who granted them autonomy see them as "different".

That understanding of "difference" is what lies behind the motives pushing Zionism.

Without "difference" there would be no need for "Jewish identity" and there would be no need for Zionism, or even anti-Zionism or antisemitism.

It is worth remembering that the most ardent Zionists (including Zionism's founders!), even before the 1930's, were Eastern Jews. Westernized Jews, viewed Eastern Jews (in German Ostjuden) as miscreants and subversives who wanted to force Western Jews (who mostly saw themselves as Western Europeans above all else) to become just Jews.

I'm waiting to see Richard Spencer-ites address Nietzsche's views on pederasty and pedophilia tho.

*As a reminder, I've already done that, making me more Nietzschean than Richard Spencer lol

"So are you an antisemite, or a philosemite"

"Yes"

Richard Spencer-ites finally understand Nietzsche's views on Jews and "antisemitism" vs. "philosemitism".

I admit that it took me some time to get to this position as well.

Jews are arguably the only people who can be readily assimilated into a population without much effort.

Think of Arab Jews, European Jews or Turkic Jews, "Southern" Jews etc...

The reason for this is most likely to do with how their religion is their race, and their race is their religion.

No other group on the planet has a similar identity. Africans were animists when they were enslaved by the (Muslim) Arabs and (Christian) Europeans. They had to be converted to Abrahamism, and then "assimilated" (even though this did not really work in either the Arab or European case).

They're the only group that can't be "integrated" in a way that would make sense to people. "Integration"/autonomy for Jews means the "Pale of Settlement", the "Jewish Oblast" or funny hats or Star of David patches.

They have to be fully assimilated into the overall identity to be both guaranteed protection, as well as (ironically) to be prevented from engaging in subversion (why would they subvert their own and only identity?).

This is how you solve Zionism. This is how you solve "antisemitism". This is how you solve "The Jewish Question".

This all goes back to "the powers that be" at that time refusing to give rights to minorities (sexual, racial, ethnic etc...), but only some, and only specific rights and not all rights.

It's a very "liberal" thing to do, to say you're going to give people "rights" but then hoodwink them by only giving a part of them partial rights. It has "divide et impera" all over it.

I imagine Americans of African descent know something about that...

Or gay people in the West in general (they were forced to abandon all links with other groups in order to be given their rights, therefore causing a rupture whose fallout we still see today in regards to how various sexual minorities are treated differently).

Or any "legitimized minority" group there is (Gurkhas in the U.K perhaps?) - https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2003/feb/21/military.

There is a massive irony in RadFems drawing upon the imagery of the Suffragette movement to promote their own ideology.

Their "gender-critical" ideology is based on DENYING RIGHTS to people, not supporting the rights of women, which t-people don't infringe on but rather (if you were to see the nuace) reinforce (t-rights are anti-patriarchial by nature, which was at the core of the Suffragette cause).

RadFems use almost the exact same line of argumentation as the anti-Suffragette women used in the early 1900's!

The Anti-Suffragette movement was extremely conservative, patriarchial (obviously), religiously driven, and based on psuedoscience and conspiracy.

The modern-day RadFem/TERF movement is based on social-conservatism (whether "right" or "left"), largely run by conservatives or "right-wing" "liberals" with a heavy dose of religiously inspired dogma and moralism as well as psuedoscience and conspiracy.

"Some women opposed suffrage because they were afraid they would have to give up something valuable"

"Some women felt that they occupied a sheltered and valued position"

"Other anti-suffragists clung to Victorian ideals and feared that the social change that suffrage would bring would also bring a loss of privileges and protection women had been given as a result of being the "weaker sex"" (internalized misogyny, very interesting, and relevant when considering how women react to MtF athletes)

"...the image of the "new woman" would destroy the respect and status they enjoyed as wives and mothers"

"Their goal was to educate the public about the evils of the... movement"

"...Women may have been on the forefront of the movement to deny women... right(s)..."

https://www.nebraskastudies.org/en/1900-1924/votes-for-women/opposition-to-womens-suffrage/#:~:text=If%20a%20woman%20became%20involved%20in%20politics%2C,that%20suffragists%20were%20%22anti%2Dfemale%2C%20anti%2Dfamily%2C%20and%20anti%2DAmerican.%22

"Opposition to women’s suffrage relied on false narratives that seem particularly outrageous, and sometimes comical, even for that era"

"...mental effort of voting could make women infertile"

“And if women overexerted their already inferior brains, the thinking went, their health could suffer”

https://newslit.org/updates/19th-amendment-false-narratives/

"A supporter of Kendal, Vicky Jane, told PinkNews that the “campaign T-shirts of the anti-trans movement” felt “intimidating,” and that she feels that the suffragette movement is being appropriated to exclude trans women"

https://www.thepinknews.com/2018/09/26/linda-bellos-private-prosecution-trans-women/

Tand paper on the subject of Mumsnet appropriating the Suffrage cause:

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14680777.2022.2032788#d1e161

@tomie you're a misandrist. No man will ever love you like you desperately want.

@tomie BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Tomie, if you share something that means you either agree with the content, or you disagree with the content. Why else would you share it?

You offered no counter to the content. So, obviously you agreed with the content, so yes, you agreed with a WN/NN who says that 14 year old is good to fuck, while claiming that you hate all men and that 14 years old is a child and that anyone who says things like that is a predator who should be castrated and they're untrustworthy and should be jailed etc... etc... etc...

You are literally proving the argument that RadFems/TERFs JK Rowlites are TOTALLY FINE and actually SUPPORT allying with WN/NNs to attempt to dunk on t's (who make up less than 1% of the population on average) because of "school biology". You are so intellectually weak that you can't even see the logical consequences of your own stupid actions.

You are pathetic. You're not a "Feminist" like you keep trying to claim. You're a misandrist who wants to pick on the weakest in society to make yourself feel good. You are a sadist, basically. No surprise that you ally with other sadists, even those who you profess to hate.

I'm sorry you have never had a proper boyfriend, but taking out your anger on men in general or ts or pedos is just insane. They aren't responsible for you being lonely, YOU ARE.

@tomie BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

Oh my God.

For everyone who sees this thread, Tomie basically inserts herself into other people's posts, harrasses them (by her own definition of what "harrassment" is), then complains that THEY'RE the ones harrassing her, then makes false claims about them, then tries contacting admins/mods to delete the account, then runs away, then comes back. Rinse and repeat.

She is an insane harpy RadFem. Honestly, I don't even think other RadFems would think this is a good look.

@tomie BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

You literally share posts from a WN/NN who thinks that having sex with a 14 year old (a "child" by your definition) should be legal.

BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

I'm sorry Tomie, but you are a fucking smelly RadFem retard.

@tomie

@tomie

Lol

Like I have kept pointing out, you're the one projecting.

Like a woman tied to the bed and blindfolded claiming that the man is beholden to her.

Cute...

@tomie yeah?

To me you seem more like this:

*Only in abstract terms, she's most likely much more attractive than you are irl

In fact, isn't that interesting? I'm your "amusement", and you're my sex-toy who likes being whipped...

BDSM truly works wonders...

@tomie if that's the case why don't you stop replying to my "delirious" comments and go back to sitting on that dildo or shoving that showerhead inbetween your legs?

At least that way you can take some time to calm the fuck down.

@tomie

I lied about nothing.

You lied about not being a RadFem JK Rowling supporting TERF misandrist.

Nothing I did or said on this thread is "hypocritical".

You are projecting.

Funnily enough, JK Rowling projects all the time on her social media accounts hahahahaha

Birds of a feather...

@tomie no, actually, "gender" as a term was created well before that guy was even born.

I'm not saying "I'm screenshotting" as a threat, I'm saying I'm screenshotting so that in the future I can point out to everyone, with little effort on my part, that you are, in fact, a lying, deceitful bitch who should not be interacted with in any way by anyone (even other WN/NNs).

@LukeAlmighty there's nothing wrong with being fat btw.

There is however something wrong with LARPing like a fuckboy, obsessing about "woke left" "soy boys" but then doing nothing to better your own condition.

@LukeAlmighty you're fat.