The Anglo-American control over people's children is such a despicable thing.

Every "online safety law" that's ever been passed is based on Anglo-American Puritan morality.

Every single one.

They go around the world forcing people to adopt their stupid prudish restrictive "sex is the worst thing ever!" customs.

The irony is that "online sex crimes" are rising exponentially, year after year after year after year BECAUSE of this puritanical lunacy.

Show thread

"A spokesperson for the regulator, Ofcom, said the measures were "encouraging", but added "tech companies will have to do a lot more in the coming months to protect children online"."

Everytime they say "protect children online", you can guarantee that there is some sort of insane restriction coming.

The whole point of "social-gaming" is that you have friends to game with.

Banning them from talking to friends while playing a game is going to push them into more dangerous areas where there aren't such ludicrous restrictions.

Fucking shit, this is so obvious.

Do any of these fucking idiots have children? Do they remember their own childhood? Do they even care about children?

We all know they don't care about children at all. They care more about money and making up new "rules".

bbc.com/news/articles/c86j9ygw

"Assimilationism" is the exact type of "Globalism" shit that right-wing White Nationalist "conspiracy theorist" types rail about non-stop.

It is the destruction of difference. It is the direct negation of "separate, but equal".

Yet they paradoxically say shit like "if you come here, you have to become [insert nationality]" or "why did you come here if you aren't [insert religion]?" etc... etc...

Teddy Roosevelt once said that he was fine with anyone coming to America, as long as they became "American" and discarded any former identity.

Teddy Roosevelt was also a globalist imperialist who wanted a (White) American Empire (even if he was relatively benevolent in its application).

"Assimilationism" is the policy of expansionist supremacist Empire. And, just like with Rome, it plays a major part in the host's downfall. The original citizens grow decadent, self-obsessed and aloof, while the "new citizens" become agitated by obvious lies, discrimination and their use as fodder for never-ending imperialist designs.

blog.oup.com/2021/09/an-empire

Show thread

Assimilationism doesn't work. It doesn't matter how much you try to force it, or gatekeep to achieve it, or gaslight etc...

It will never work, in any field.

Those who want to assimilate are the equivalent of a slave wanting preferential treatment from their masters by turning in "rebellious" (i.e. they are not under the strict control of the master) compatriots. They are Steven, from "Django Unchained". They are cowardly, hypocritical, opportunistic, weak-willed, sadistic, narcissistic, misguided and simple.

Their slavish behavior does not even lead to their master actually treating them better. It just leads to their master being content that they have divided yet another group ("divide and conquer") and prevented people from uniting against them. The assimilationist therefore aids in keeping people in bondage, not freeing them. They end up justifying their own abuse. It's Stockholm Syndrome.

The solution is and arguably has always been integrationism, not assimilationism.

The reason assimilationists hate integration is that it presupposes that they have to treat the "out-group" as equals to the host/majoritiy.

Of course, there's an irony there, because everyone in the West (left and right, top and bottom, "conservative" and "liberal") loves saying "all men are created equal". That's kinda been the whole point of "Western civilization" for hundreds of years (even if it hasn't been properly applied).

So assimilationists are not only Stephen from "Django Unchained", but they are the Pigs from "Animal Farm"; "some animals are more equal than others".

The entire premise of "assimilationism" is rooted in lies and hypocrisy and an ignorance of their own civilizations' founding principles. This is why it fails, and why, the more people try to push it, the worse the situation gets.

@Lana @MENUMA432

Elon and his supporters posing for a picture.

Randy Fine says "the streets of Gaza should run red with Palestinian blood" - I sleep

A protester says "Israel is gay" - Real shit

Show thread

Meanwhile, the Trump-supported "MAGA" Republican who won Florida (by a smaller margin than previous elections) says that anyone who criticizes Israel should get 5 years in jail, of course, this being a direct infringement on the 1st Amendment, the thing that Trump says he is defending.

"You'll get tired of winning!"

Show thread

Elon Musk tried to win Wisconsin's election by:

1.) Open Bribery (while simultaneously calling-out George Soros, lol)
2.) Ponzi Scheme

And he still lost.

What a fucking idiot loser bitch-boy.

loli manifesto :loligun: 

@beardalaxy lol

Nice April Fool's joke. 10/10.

@bulky_nerd used to be that way.

I remember buying my first beer legally when I was still in boarding school.

Nowadays, with the Americanization of everything, they're pushing it to 18 for most things.

Just another example of America imposing its morality laws around the world.

@bulky_nerd hahaha

Depends where.

Most places don't allow teens to drink, but everyone who's lived in Europe during their teenage years has drunk something.

In France the saying is "kids know about wine-culture before they are double-digits" (my French friend told me this one).

@bulky_nerd

I'm not saying they can't be MAPs.

It's just that their wider ideology is in conflict with that.

For example, I remember reading an extract by an Italian Fascist journalist who visited Germany during the Weimar era (when they were in the midst of a depression), and he talked about having sex with underage girls and loving it.

I really got to find that piece again, it was crazy. The guy basically said "I love the young German girls" haha.

But again, he was a Fascist.

@bulky_nerd Neeezi MAPs are a good example of what I mean.

As I said in an earlier discussion, sure, they can support things like lowering AOC, or allowing child-marriage etc... But that is only to fulfil a greater ultra-conservative ideology.

So, on the whole, their ideology does more harm to MAPs and the youth than good.

@bulky_nerd of course some of their views are agreeable.

The problem comes when you look at them generally, or "on the whole".

Then it becomes apparent that whatever good views they have on sexuality, on "youth-liberation" on "individual rights", on "freedom", that those views are offset by views that are in direct opposition. And those oppositionary views are greater in number.

I think this year will see the rolling back of Anglo-American thought-hegemony.

People will realize that it's all just hypocrisy and lies. There is nothing to it aside from trying to get a one-up on your own brothers. It's not about "liberty", unless that "liberty" was the "liberty to exploit your fellow man for a penny more".

This shit is like the plot of MGSV, except instead of the English language, it's about English thought.

youtube.com/watch?v=saxI0Zu1AB

Show thread

It's no surprise that Sargon inevitably devolved into a caricature of "Lockeanism" (which he doesn't even understand).

> Racist, but denies it
> C(r)apitalist. Hates any aspect of socialism
> Wants the British Empire back
> Wants to subjugate others
> LARPs like a great thinker
> Hates the Enlightenment and the ideas of the French Revolution
> Simultaneously claims to be "liberal" or "Classical Liberal"

Show older
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.