Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
"No right-wing lolicons..."
"Normalization, pedo. Pedo, not this, go legit. Normalization, pedo, normalization!"
"No right-wing lolicons..."
"Pedo..."
"This was Talal's Pedi instance..."
*Unsheaths sword and charges*
"TALAL!!!!!! TALAL!!!!!!"
*Gunfire*
"NO RIGHT-WING LOLICONS!!!!! NO RIGHT-WING LOLICONS!!!!!"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Oj2PEYC7nQU&ab_channel=TopClips
"I'm giving the Glorbons and Blorgons 2 weeks to fix everything"
- Blumbold Stump
This is what an overreliance on AI will create:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h1BQPV-iCkU&t=18s&ab_channel=PassivelySedentary
Human dystopiaYouTube
A few weeks ago I had a phone conversation with a friend of mine, and the subject of AI came up.
We both found it funny that university students now are using AI to write their weekly reading-reports or to help with their theses.
In our day, you actually had to do the research yourself. You had to spend time reading things, learning things, thinking for yourself etc...
Nowadays, none of that is really necessary. If you have a good enough AI program, you can get it to write your papers for you and then all you have to do is make slight aesthetic edits to it to make it seem like it was written by a human.
AI is basically making people dumb. It is eliminating our capacity for cognition by outsourcing it to a robot.
I'm not saying all AI is 100% bad, but the overreliance on it to "do all the work" as of late is deeply worrying.
I use AI for porn or to write a letter of motivation for a job application. That is penuts compared to using it for writing research papers or using it to help "win" wars.
I remember back in the day when I was one of those guys.
What was the cure?
Loli porn. lol.
LOLI PORN FOR EVERYONE!!!!
"None of this would have happened if I was President" except it's a MAP/Pedo Party candidate.
Best recent example is the claim that the Obummer Iran nuclear (which Trump unilaterally pulled out of in 2018, leading Iran to go against the IAEA) deal was bad but Trump's Iran nuclear deal is good.
Deciding whether to post a low-quality post-workout photo in order to show detractors that I actually do work out (unlike them).
Should I post it to begin with?
Should I even post it today instead of waiting for tomorrow so I can post back photos alongside?
I'm not going to be able to sleep because I'm ruminating over such important issues....
@matrix I think I've got an even better hypothetical.
Say you, as a man, wanted to impregnate your girlfriend (no specific age requirement here), but she didn't want to get pregnant.
If she went on the pill or got an abortion, does that therefore mean that she doesn't love you or isn't "aroused" by you?
No, of course not.
Does that mean you'd not be "aroused" by her (because you know you can't procreate as long as she's on the stuff, which is up to her to change)? Also, no.
It means she's not ready but still wants to spend time with you, because you pleasure her with your presence.
"Love" = Mutual pleasuring.
Really quite simple to understand, tbh.
Voltaire was right, Hedonism beats Christcuckery.
@matrix driving at higher speeds is more dangerous in certain specific circumstances, that is why you are allowed to drive at high speeds on the highway but not on regular pedestrian roads.
German Autobahn moment (no speed-limit).
In the 60s-70s it was a social justice issue (along with all types of other social justice causes) because of Conservative Christian Puritanism (CCP lol) being imposed on Europe (again, mostly from America and the United Kingdom) in the wake of WW2. In the Dutch case I was reading a study that pointed out the irony of the "sexual revolution" actually being led by religious figures who were tired of the religious moralistic dogma regarding sexuality.
It was done by nobles in like the 1700's haha, I'm talking about the 1900's. Slightly different times.
Yes, the average age of marriage was 20, that doesn't mean the AOC was 20.
> Being aroused by something/someone that can't reproduce isn't normal behavior
Why do you get "aroused" while looking at loli porn of "single-digits" then? That's pedophilia, but as you say you can't reproduce, so why are you "aroused"? There has to be another reason, and that reason is obviously just "pleasure". You like looking at the pictures because you get a boner and you like the feeling of cumming. That is normal. It's strange that you'd imply that it was abnormal. Even chimps jack off.
Linking arousal with reproduction is a Christian Puritan morality thing that is designed to limit sex and pleasure. "Don't spill your seed on the ground" - Genesis 38.
I think it implied that it was "non-exclusive", but that's neither here nor there, as I'm also "non-exclusive" (Danni Ashe is a goddess) yet I aknowledge my attractions in all cases.
> Just the ones who act.
In what way? You earlier implied that hebephilia is something most (i.e. over 10-20%, right?) men share. You link "action" with "violence", but as you and I both know, "consent" can be given below the official "age of consent", and often is (on the dl, "if no one found out"). Are you saying "statuatory rape" is as "violent" as actual rape? We all know that's false.
What are your views on the cases of female school-teachers being in totally consensual relations with their students? Are they "violent" for "acting" on their desires? Or is it different because they can get pregnant and therefore the Christian morality (this time centered on Patriarchy) checks out?
@Oaghaji Blossom kills her instantaneously with her lazer-eyes.
My irl friends have sometimes told me that I'm "brave" or show "courage" for speaking my mind almost all of the time, but I interpret that pessimistically.
If I'm considered "brave" or "courageous" by my best friends, with chiseled jawlines, blonde and blue-eyed, 6 ft 4, full Aryan ubermensch phenotype, work in government, have shaken hands with Prime Ministers and Presidents etc... then what does that say about what "bravery" or "courage" is in the modern-day?
"Bravery", "courage", "honor", "honesty"...
Following these virtues is a punishment in of itself regardless of whether it's related to my thoughts about sexuality specifically or just my other everyday thoughts...
I think I should remind (again) everyone from the "Para" community who views, likes and/or shares my content, I was not always this way.
In fact, I was quite a strong "anti", although this became more muted once I started watching loli porn and came to terms with my sexuality and my own life. I still was "in the closet" for a while, and then became a "morality police" sort of guy. Only now do I see how I was still wrong at all those stages.
There are people on F/Pedi and in other places who I attacked in the past, and I want to apologize to them but obviously I don't want to name them (for their safety, not for mine).
Of course, no apology on my part will be enough. I can't turn back time; I can't remove the pain I may have caused.
I guess this is a reason I let some people from these communities follow me but most not, and I rarely if ever follow people back.
The only thing I can say is that I try to be more level-headed now. I try not to be knee-jerk. I try to understand people. I'm trying to rekindle my empathetic side, although I still can get angry and go on the offensive against people (especially those who remind me of my past self).
I'm not asking people to forgive me. I'm just saying that I apologize.
In a strange sort of way, I think I deserve "punishment", but not in a conventional way. This is probably why I just post everything in public. It's just something that I have to do. My "punishment" is to be attacked by people who I would have considered "allies" only a few years ago. My "punishment" is to fight my demons out in the open.
I've come to the conclusion that "Pedos"/"MAP"s do more to promote and protect true freedom than anyone else.
This is why they are despised.
Because they promote actual freedom (of thought, of love, of action) from the repressive system, and not compromise "freedom" within said system.
They remind everyone else that they are shackled to archaic, at best corrupted and at worst completely false moralizing systems of control.
Every time a group (racial, religious, ethnic, sexual etc...) compromises with the system to get its "freedom", it ends up being the "freedom" to live on a reservation, with the population "controlled".
No compromises with this oppressive system! Assimilationism is not the answer, but integration! Assimilation involves cutting out one's own identity, integration involves championing one's identity.
This system deserves to be defeated, in totality.
Then, and only then, can the hand of mercy be extended to the defeated adversaries like Alexander the Great did with the defeated Persians.
ZEUS BE WITH US!!!!!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y4XfV0vdMAA&ab_channel=BigBOSS
I don't know man, whatever...
Joined Nov 2021
