Aldo @Aldo2@gameliberty.club

@Jazzy_Butts

> 1.5 million views

> Comments disabled

What did they mean by this?

Hrmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.........

@Jazzy_Butts oh no don't watch the 10 year old video of Russian schoolgirls in tight leotards twerking on Youtube, it's "criminal", you don't want to do that because then "the Feds" will come and get you for watching.....A......Youtube video which......Mainstream sites reported on and linked on their articles.....

I'm this close to posting the Russian Schoolgirl Bumblebee Twerk video...

I don't get how posting a non-nude video of a girl doing a cartwheel, taken in the U.S. (Utah) is somehow "violating U.S. law" or "violating community guidelines" or "promoting criminality" or......"Spam"...

Months ago I posted pictures of children holding Hezbollah flags with the word "lgf" in the post, and it was taken down for "sexualizing children" (what?). It was then put back up.

Is the "rule" that you can't post any pictures/videos of children ever, never, ever, even if they're non-nude and even if the context in the video/picture is not sexual at all, because SOMEONE MIGHT think "wow, cute/hot"?

Just say it then. Stop giving me these weaksauce excuses and/or deflections.

One of the most ridiculous things I see argued by "right-wing lolicons" is that lolicon ISN'T pedophilia, but toddlercon IS pedophilia.

They argue about art-style, even though the art-style in most cases is the exact same. Heck, many times it's the same artist drawing both (especially regarding Japanese artists).

They argue about "realism", even though once again this is shared by both toddlercon and lolicon and is more-so a lolicon thing to begin with. Artists are getting better, and there's also AI, and 3DCG is a thing, and there's definitely more 3DCG lolicon than there is 3DCG toddlercon.

They say it's because of the age of the subject being drawn, but that also doesn't make any sense considering lolicon is about prepubescent girls 90% of the time.

These arguments just don't hold up to even the slightest scrutiny.

@matrix yeah they did.

They asked men if they would have sex with a 14 year old, a 12 year old and a 10 year old, EVEN IF it was illegal ("if no one found out").

They also asked about sex with 15-18 year olds, and of course many men said "yes" to that, too.

In many European countries the AOC was like 12 in the 1970's, I don't know what you're on. This is just assuming everywhere has always been like America. News flash, Matrix, America is forcing this on everyone. This is not natural or normal. This is artificial. Japan only recently outlawed "CP" in 2014, after heavy American pressure.

The ability to reproduce is not an arbitrary thing that just "occurs" once you're over 12. "Early Bloomers" are a thing for one, and why do you again assume that having a relationship with a member of the opposite sex automatically entails wanting to "reproduce"? This is the same way as saying that "consent" is a thing that just magically happens at 16 or 18.

It was like on average 10% for wanting to have sex with a prepubescent, and around 20% when you factor in all "minors" (under 18, which is the AOC in Australia).

@Jazzy_Butts good thing today was leg and back day ;)

@Jazzy_Butts don't attack Varg!

He'll conjure some Wotan shit to make you infertile!!

Retract your statement!!!!

@matrix if I told you that 20% of (mostly European) Australian men were at the very least MAPs (by definition, meaning they are attracted to people under the AOC, meaning "minors") what would you think?

Would you say 20% of the male population of Australia should be institutionalized, or would it cause some reflection and introspection?

This 20% is not based on political affiliation at all, and as we've just seen anyways, Australia voted for an anti-Trumper recently.

@Jazzy_Butts that's Varg, one of the trickiest and slipperiest "far-right"ists out there.

Burned down a Church. Murdered a bandmate.

Nordicist, Pagan, European.

Famous for being a Nazi one moment, and then supporting left-wingers (they have more children) the next.

Truly a "Radical Centrist (TM)".

@Jazzy_Butts

@Jazzy_Butts nah, I think they were always an extreme Christian.

Evangelicals love Trump, even though Trump is basically the anti-Christ by Christian definition lol

@Jazzy_Butts that's not true.

Upon further research, one Democrat flopped on one vote, but another person who was shot didn't flop.

This thing was most likely about abortion.

And either way, the perp was a Trump-voter.

@matrix I dunno, I think some of them (Poast/Varis/Detroit) are at least over 20.

And they want to lower the AOC to 14, making them by legal and clinical definition a "MAP". While claiming that they aren't MAPS and saying that if you mutually and consensually sext with a 14 year old then you're an "abusing rapist" or whatever.

Like I said, projection.

Fuentesites (like Beardson Beardly, who is definitely over 25) argue that the AOC should be 10 following some obscure Catholic law.

Etc... etc... etc...

Point is, there's nothing inherently wrong with pedophilia, which I genuinely believe that more and more and more people are concluding.

There IS something wrong with being a "right-wing" schizo nutjob who wants to murder people at a peaceful protest (1st amendment) and then claim they were a victim of "Marxist AntiFa Islamist violent rioters" or whateverthefuck.

@matrix whenever I get brigaded by Post/Detroit/Varish etc... "right-wing lolicon" types they almost always devolve into "woodchipper pedonigger", so.....

@matrix I think we need to check these Trucker's HDs to confirm haha

I bet we'd find all kinds of "degenerate" "kinky" and even "criminal" porn on that stuff.

Have you ever heard about truckstop bathrooms?

@matrix yeah, but those people also watch loli porn on the dl anyways, like Nick Fuentes fans making posts about huffing their little sisters' panties.

All this "woodchipper" nonsense reeks of projection.

@matrix also, I just realized that this idiot is 19.

That means he was 9 years old when I was in my "Alt-Right" phase.

It's amazing how today's "far-right" people are even more deranged than the "far-rightists" back in my day.

And it's not like they have learned from the mistakes of the past. It's actually more like they ignored the lessons and just thought the answer to the mistakes was to double-down.

@matrix OK?

So another "based right-winger" who supposedly would want to "woodchipper pedos" ends up being a pedo?

I mean, fair enough.

It just makes the "right-wingers" look even more stupid.

@matrix everyone is a pedo nowadays.

Even you'd be considered a pedo by most people.