Voting in the US 

If you are entitled to, please vote. Politicians will not do anything to help you if you don't vote.

Before the election, get a sample ballot for your local area and research everyone on it, even if you think you already know about them.

If you can't be at the polls on election day, you can probably vote early or get a postal ballot. Additionally, if you expect difficulty with transportation, many community groups will take people to the polls for free.

re: Voting in the US 

#politics @alexbuzzbee voting legitimizes our democratic institution, which has totally failed. Nobody should vote, and those who do vote are shameful traitors.
Follow

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @alexbuzzbee The elections are obviously going to be rigged anyway. Even if they aren't rigged, everyone's going to assume they were, just like they did last time.

re: Voting in the US 

@Galena @alexbuzzbee Yes. There are countless scandals during every election. Its obvious to anyone who is paying attention that the american voting system is the most corrupt in the first world.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena Yes, it is broken. That is undeniable. But not voting doesn't help fix the problems at all. The system can be influenced and moved in the direction of fixing these problems.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena
>But not voting doesn't help fix the problems at all.
I never claimed it fixed any problems.

If you want to fix problems get rich and lobby.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena So if not voting doesn't help, why accuse voters of being "traitors?" That's extremely dangerous rhetoric.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena
>So if not voting doesn't help, why accuse voters of being "traitors?"
the consequences of not voting are not necessarily related to the behavior of voting. To wit: it's not always the case that if x is y then not x is not y. So I find this line of reasoning confused

>why accuse voters of being "traitors?"
Because legitimizing a corrupt institution enables it to further cause damage to the citizenry.

>That's extremely dangerous rhetoric.
Yes.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena If you acknowledge that your rhetoric is dangerous, why should I continue this conversation?

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena Why would that cause any issue? "Dangerous rhetoric", as the word is colloquially used, does not actually endanger anything but ideas.

Although I suppose if you want an excuse to leave gracefully, now is as good of a time as any. Perhaps you are too invested in the voting process, perhaps due to state propaganda from public school, to question it. That's completely understandable.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena Endangering the concept of democracy is not something I am willing to allow. Is that or is that not your intention?

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena
>Endangering the concept of democracy is not something I am willing to allow.
would you say that, no matter what anyone said, you wouldn't change your mind about the concept of democracy?

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena Unless I am shown very strong evidence to the contrary, I will persist in my belief that democracy, when correctly functioning, is the best currently-available system of government to protect civil liberties and avoid certain hazardous extremes.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena Sounds utopic.

There are many legitimate criticisms of democracy, from Plato and Thucydides to Jefferson. You should probably balance your "belief" with some scholarship because you sound like a political radical.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena "Democracy is good" doesn't sound like an extreme position to me.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena

The famous quote goes, "democracy isn't good but it's better than the other choices", so yes, unless you mean it in the absolutely broadest sense, yes, it is an extreme position.

'X is good' is always a radical position. Reality is nuanced, and what is good depends on many factors.

for example, democracy was a disaster in post cold-war russia. It was a disaster for Iraq. Often, in poor countries, democracy means that rich foreign organizations can buy up the parliament and get exclusive privileges to exploit the natural resources. Most recently, this happened in Ukraine.

It's not necessarily bad. It's just one possible political organization.

Anyway, this whole topic is not really related because we are stuck with the american political system.

re: Voting in the US 

@fluffy @Galena The American system is broken. It needs fixing. But the core democratic mechanisms are in my opinion functional. We should use them to fix the problems. Watch out for attempts at election interference, but keep voting. I think that is my final position in this discussion.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @Galena May the gods grant that your voting makes a big difference.

re: Voting in the US 

@Galena @fluffy There is dangerous corruption in the press, which is, I believe, what the original version of this compilation was trying to highlight. That does not mean that the concept of something being dangerous to democracy is itself somehow problematic.

re: Voting in the US 

@alexbuzzbee @fluffy This conversation reminded me of the clip, and I thought it was funny and relevant. I posted it before you mentioned endangering democracy.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.