The Irish aren't White.
@amerika Yes, I consider them white, I also base whiteness more on body structure than on skin color. So a very dark Indian is more white to my eye than a lighter skinned person with more "afican" features.
Both have admixture, therefore are going to genocide Whites if mixed into the group.
@amerika Admixture is a broad concept, all human beings share genetic code, because all beings share genetic code. The difference between a black and a white is a spectrum, this is why a person with 1% black DNA looks white, just like how a blob of white paint with a miniscule dot of black mixed in will still look white, it is only in the details that it is not, and the details only apply in scientific matters, the majority of human life is not a scientific matter in my opinion, since science is an art applied in precise constraints, and that does not mirror normal life, scientific matters are much more taxing than normal life because of the focus required. And so I would see no problem calling someone with 1% black dna, and 99% white dna, white, even though it would be a euphemism, because in truth they would be mixed.
For thirty generations after admixture, you get those original traits re-appearing at random (atavism).
What percentage do you think that is?
You might enjoy our #HumanBiodiversity (#HBD) group on Gab:
@amerika What percentage do I think this random cropping up of traits occurs, or what percentage of admixture do I think is required for such traits to crop up (at a rate I do not know)? It doesn't matter to me if traits pop up or not, the presence of the genetic code is the trait in and of itself, it is all that is required to make someone non-white, I'm using that term scientifically, since colloquially any person not exhibiting non-white traits would be called non-white, while those who did not exibit such traits but had "corrupted" DNA, would still be called white. And so, many, many "white" people are non-white, scientifically speaking, as many "Asian" people are non-asian, due to african or white genetic code, and as many africans because of their dna being mixed with non-africans.
@amerika obviously I mean any person not exhibiting non-white traits, would be colloquially called white
@amerika shit fuck I'm all over the place I give up I think you get the idea though, I'm too drunk
Anyone who looks, acts, and thinks Western European is good by me.
The bigger principle is that diversity is toxic even with trace admixture.
Separation is the goal.
If White has meaning however, it means the unmixed group.
@amerika A white mixed with black, or "yellow"(I omit "red" because american indians are a type of asian), is not white, or black, or yellow, that doesn't mean they're any better or worse inherently as people.
@amerika Yes, I agree
@Jazzy_Butts
If Irish are "white," so are Indians, Jews, Arabs, and Libyans.