@caskd that is a literal child

@Flanker that is a literal drawing

@caskd you don't get to pull the "oh it's just a drawing shit" cunt if you're sexually attracted to children you're a pedophile simple as

@Flanker if you define that as a pedo then i'm a pedo
cry about it

@caskd @Flanker im so proud of you for coming out. would you like a referral to nnia.space?

@grumpy @caskd @Flanker i mean

@kallisti @grumpy @Flanker lmaoo, there's much worse shit you can take from me out of context

@caskd @Flanker @grumpy yes, but i dont have screenshots of that! you should provide them

@kallisti @Flanker @grumpy nahh, i'm good

@caskd @Flanker @grumpy please tell me

@kallisti @Flanker @grumpy hm?

@caskd @Flanker @grumpy incriminating screenshots

@kallisti @caskd @Flanker @grumpy im going to make sure tthat this man is forced to consume virtual child pornography for the rest of his days

@rats @grumpy @caskd @kallisti buddy you're not making yourself sound any less in the wrong here

@Flanker @grumpy @caskd @rats lol moralist

@kallisti you're rats at work eris yeah?

@Flanker im your mother

@Flanker @rats @grumpy @caskd are you going to write a fediblock post

@kallisti @Flanker @caskd @grumpy snowflake moment

@rats @Flanker @caskd @grumpy idk i agree that drawings of kids are sussy things to like but im not gonna be like this about it bcos it just wastes time

@kallisti @rats @Flanker @grumpy yeah but liking drawings of specificially crafted sexual kids and actual child molestation is a big jump tbf

@caskd @kallisti @Flanker @grumpy

drawings do not bother me idk

this is also a drawing of some like quasi dragon creature

i dont know what homeboys point is, whenever i see someone like this i feel like they have no idea why actual CSAM is bad and are just kind of some sociopath

@rats @caskd @Flanker @grumpy the general justification is that enjoying the depiction is hitting the same wires; i dont enjoy the categorisation as equivalent to csam but i think the wires argument has some merit

@kallisti @Flanker @caskd @grumpy

it could be, idk - what i care about though is artistic expression. i think it's totally valid to not want to see stuff like this - except for flanker, who is being put into a device of my own invention where he can no longer opt out of bearing witness to virtual child pornography for the rest of his life. but anyone else should be able to avoid this if they want!

what i don't agree with is making it illegal and/or this whiny baby shit this homie is doing

@rats @grumpy @caskd @kallisti
> i think it's totally valid to not want to see stuff like this

the original post was not CW'd nor was it set to "sensitive" or whatever it's called on pleroma and also it's post scope was public meaning that it appeared on the known network timeline.

@Flanker @grumpy @kallisti @rats well, tbf that is a boy so i didn't think it needed any such things, i didn't see this as sexual in any way but i can see how it could be understood as such