Rant + Vent 

I've said it before, but the moralistic attitude people develop when someone draws porn of real kids is fucking ridiculous. The argument ALWAYS boils down to the same talking point "It's a real child!!!!!1!!" but that's not even true. It's still just a drawing, a fantasy. There can't be a victim if it never happened. No matter how grossed out or offended you find the fact of the matter is nobody can be truly be harmed by a drawing, video game, or a cartoon

South Park back in 2010 did a bit where they brutally killed an, at the time, 16yo Justin Bieber for a joke. The Youtuber Meatcanyon did a video where Tom Brady makes out with his young son, again for a joke. People for some reason didn't have a problem with this because it's in the name of comedy. But it's still "REAL ACTUAL CHILDREN" in violent and sexual situations. Why should the context matter this time? Under their own definitions these should still be considered csam

Of course they're nothing but weak-willed hypocrites and don't actually care about their own supposed moral standard. If it makes them feel uncomfortable, regardless if it hurts anybody, then is verboten

Sorry for the rant just needed to get this off my chest again

re: Rant + Vent 

@Slab0fMeat antis treat drawings like real people, and real people like drawings

re: Rant + Vent 

@zoocat This is very true, but I'm also talking about segments of the lolicon community that draw the line at drawings of irl kids. The artist Abe is getting a lot of dumb comments from them because of what he drew recently. Ironically regurgitating standard anti arguments in process lol
Follow

re: Rant + Vent 

@Slab0fMeat @zoocat The slipper slope of speech control. I've heard even as late as the 70s that literal youknowwhat was legal and people could order catalogues or film reels in the mail. It wasn't until the "moral panic" of the 90s (also called "the satanic panic") that we got all this retarded ass fucking bullshit where free speech doesn't apply IF and BECAUSE (the only time free speech does not apply imo is when it's national security and jacking off isn't a national security threat.).

· · Web · 0 · 0 · 3
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.