@CreamSeparatist @ChristiJunior @folk @p @s
>no one would fight and die for that right.
Nobody needs to fight and die for it for it to become a reality. That's an arbitrary rule you've setup for yourself, and I don't accept it.
>no one would fight and die for that right.
Nobody needs to fight and die for it for it to become a reality. That's an arbitrary rule you've setup for yourself, and I don't accept it.
Follow
@kekservative @ChristiJunior @folk @p @s @CreamSeparatist@neckbeard.xyz
I hate it when you meet a guy with the "right opinion" and have to see him argue it so bad.
"Right is a rule that if broken can cause an agressive retaliation"
That is my definition. The important, becuse with the women rights example, there is no pars saying that is has to be the woman who retaliates...
All they need is to look sad and you have 10 simps ready to fight for their lady. So yeah, the fight will and had happened. It just wasn't women who fought.
