@rasterman The one argument that really destroyed Warski was the one about Rape Porn. Of course there's overlap between people who watch Loli and Pedophiles, just like there's overlap between people who'd like to commit Rape and people who watch Rape Porn. Loli depicts little girls in sexual situations, without any actual children being harmed or exploited. Rape Porn depicts Rape, without any actual Rape taking place. Furthermore, there are reasons people can like those things without being future pedophiles or rapists: The rape porn can obviously appeal to those into rough sex, domination, female submission and humiliation etc. Loli can appeal to those liking petite women without visible body hair, as well as those who prefer smaller breasts. Depending on how they're drawn, anime girls look very different from IRL children, while the goal of rape porn really is to make it look like the real-life woman is being raped.
Warski had no comeback for that. He just babbled incoherently about "consent", but the whole point of rape porn is to make it look non-consensual, and it's absolutely retarded to apply the concept of "consent" to drawings and fictional characters. If Loli should be banned because pedophiles might enjoy it, then Rape porn should be banned because rapists might enjoy it. Not to mention that murderous psychopaths might enjoy playing GTA simply to kill as many people as possible.