@Elfie@neckbeard.xyz @realDonaldTrump @verita84 @aven @thatbrickster
Damn, you're so harsh at the man...

If I were to categorise him, it would be something like: A man who on purpuse decided to study symbolist.

That means, that when he speaks, he can no longer talk in a direct way sadly.

But noone has a problem with that. The true prablem is that he has sadly the biggest case of cognitive disonance, that his IQ can support. Smarter people can construct more complex ways of coping with incompatible claims.

As a child, he was told that god exists and that atheists are evil. And since then, no matter how rigorously he does study, there is no way for him to realize that he does not truly believe in god.

So first, he abstracted god to a "omnipresent being". Then, when he realized that does not fit, he abstracted further and further, until he ended up with "Abstract perfection"... But no matter how far he does abstract, he has to call it "GOD", so he cannot say he does not believe in it.

At least, that is what I got from his speeches. I might be still totally wrong, and he really might be just a pseudo-intelectual. Who knows. I am just surprised at the insight, that he does sometimes have about the political enviroment he's in.