@EmmaFaber
Or they only chose books based on topics they like, and don't really care who wrote it, like most people.
@Locksmith @grips

@EssbarRoot @Locksmith @grips

oh men have never kept it a secret have they how much they did care who wrote what and were right on with censoring women

DER Lads buybull is full of it

"Thecla joined Paul on his journey to Antioch where she ran afoul of the magistrate of the city when she refused to sleep with him. The magistrate ordered Thecla to be killed several times, but each time she was saved by God. In one of her final trials, Thecla threw herself into a body of water filled with sharks. The sharks were killed by God, and Thecla baptized herself.

It is theorized that the Acts of Paul and Thecla was kept out of the official canon because Thecla’s actions were too powerful for a woman. She acted with all the power of a man, something unacceptable at the time."

Yep women, men are really a bunch of cowards and they don't change and to this very day they continue to act in exactly the same right here.

@PonyPanda Look I don't think this account is a Israeli shill bot, I think it is fucking nuts like Barneyfag or a GPT-3 bot that has been infested with some really bizarre content, normally shill bots attempt to hide in the milieu, this account is alienating as hell with its bizarre content and writing patterns. I'm leaning more on Barneyfag tier insanity after skimming

@Salastil

What struck me right away about Emma is that I never saw anything uniquely "radfem" about her. I tried to get her on a question about male pathological behaviour being rooted in our biology which runs counter to "gender critical radical feminism" and she just ducked the whole question and went off on another Reddit-spacing rant about men wanting to rape. I don't know if I've ever seen them address the tranny question either which stands out a lot to me because trannies are the recent phenomenon that's come to define modern day radfems. I think I'm the only person outside of spinster who refers to them as radfems and not "TERFs" because that's what everyone knows them as. The feminists that hate trannies going into their bathrooms. Emma seems to be a second wave feminist stuck in the past.

From that, I think it's one of three things...

1. Emma is a boomer and she's retarded from post-menopausal estrogen deficiency causing her brain to rot
2. Emma is a shill that read one "for beginners" book on feminism that was published decades ago
3. Emma is a bot that was programmed with equally outdated information

If it's any of the latter two, possibilities, the question is why? Why would somebody post this shit or program a bot to.

I have some theories on that but... they're too prematurely formed for me to want to talk about them.

@EmmaFaber

@PonyPanda @EmmaFaber I don't believe its a bot, I've seen the account screenshot posts on the Fediverse. But this can be programmed easily in Selenium, it wouldn't be too hard to screenshot posts that have keywords in it. I also get the suspicion that the @EmmaFaber account isn't run by a woman either, there is too much aggression in it which makes me think a tranny is trying to fit in with the somewhat "radical" women on Spinster but has no idea what actually makes a woman tick mentally so it just grabs a few traits and cranks it to 11.

So I think its either a Barneyfag, a woman Barneyfag, or a tranny. I notice almost all of the spinster women avoid @EmmaFaber and rarely acknowledge it. Its not a volcano that is about to explode, the other Spinster women give off the impression that they recognize a volcano that has erupted and is putting off ash nonstop.

@PonyPanda @EmmaFaber The reason I said "tranny" is because of odd phrasing like in this screenshot. The other women don't feel compelled to shill themselves as part of the community of women, they just are. Its not something they put on or take off, its woven into their being regardless of their preferred sex in mates. The @EmmaFaber account has a healthy dose of imposter syndrome likely because its a tranny.

@Salastil
You see them saying "listen up women" as odd or cringeworthy but radfems are legit like this. I've seen them unironically talk like this IRL and it's just a reflection of standard leftist group engagement.

You've probably seen videos of political street conflict where some dumb, well meaning Trump supporter is trying to debate antifa/leftists on their own terms in good faith? Then the leftist would just repeat a chant appealing to the crowd that has nothing to do with his inquiry?

They're not trying to pass themselves off as women so much as they're just playing to the crowd. It's more because they want the reddit updoots. It might very well be that this account is a Redditor here because they killed the radfem subreddit.

But you are right about them posting more to appeal to the spinsters than meaningfully engage with us.

@EmmaFaber

@PonyPanda @Salastil @EmmaFaber
Thanks for an explanation...

I was seriously confused by that one aswell.

@PonyPanda @Salastil @EmmaFaber
I am quite pissed about the whole thing, since I would love to understand her, but it seems, she's too immersed in the grandiose illusion of a righteous fight, that I will never get to the core assumptions in her arguments.