🌿 
@mangeurdenuage Is that an actual art school? The designs are probably market-tested to work on babies or something, but it manages to be blander and more repellent than the awful 1990s Cartoon Network style that was so prevalent before.
@rasterman
>Is that an actual art school?
Yeah. There was a blog post of someone working there who exposed the blatant internal problems, but I can't find it anymore. It's not real school of art anymore it's more like a place where rich parents let their kids being supervised in adult kindergarden.
> but it manages to be blander and more repellent than the awful 1990s Cartoon Network style that was so prevalent before.
The style i's overused/miss-used. Anon explains it better than I do.
>Is that an actual art school?
Yeah. There was a blog post of someone working there who exposed the blatant internal problems, but I can't find it anymore. It's not real school of art anymore it's more like a place where rich parents let their kids being supervised in adult kindergarden.
> but it manages to be blander and more repellent than the awful 1990s Cartoon Network style that was so prevalent before.
The style i's overused/miss-used. Anon explains it better than I do.
@mangeurdenuage Makes sense. If it wasn't an overused style it wouldn't be jarring.
Follow
@rasterman @mangeurdenuage
From reading this, I thing one part was not emphasized enough.
this style does not fit action of almost any kind. That is quite a realization for me, since most western kid shows depend on action and high emotional impact.
When I saw gumball, I didn't feel in slightest that the show was dragged by the art style. On the contrary, it was perfectly fitting.
