@Countermeasures Yeah, it's interesting observations, I think the main part that I have a disagreement with is cause and effect. "There is a problem" is an evaluation of an effect (that is, it's not objective), "these people have caused the problem" is insistence on that single explanation (that it's intentional, that they've identified the responsible parties, and that those parties did so in order to achieve that end) and finally that their evidence is so scant that all they can do is shout it at everyone and stonewall any other interpretation of the thing. So I disagree with this bit:

> However, when they *nearly all* say the *same things* about the *same groups*, this is a clue that there is a real problem in the society that needs to be addressed

Even in the case that they've identified a real problem, they may not have correctly identified the source. It's possible for a unanimous vote of the entire populace to be wrong, and to stay wrong for centuries, especially when it comes to who to blame for a problem. This guy's never in his life met a pornographer, he's just seen the ends of the long chain of people repeating a few very small sources and covering some very narrow things. They're being fed the same way everyone else is, the same way you and I are, everything we haven't seen directly, every piece of information back to one small group, he's just getting the trickle-down from a different set of small groups than most other people are: they didn't "notice" anything, they read DS, which gets its information from elsewhere, all the way up the chain, to someone deciding which stories to push. It's not an accident all of these journos declared the Boulder shooter to be some white incel, they're being fed by different sources.

This is why I keep talking about keeping your eyes open, we're all wrong about half the things we think, you've got to keep that in mind all the time and keep your eyes open. Every time you are surprised, you were wrong, and the explanation of the world that you were using is just one of many possible explanations of the facts that you know. Rushing to blame someone or something is just deciding that there's exactly one explanation for what people tell you that you've seen, and confirmation bias takes over from there. People with this "the Jews did it" mentality have decided on one explanation (an explanation that looks wrong to me); they are unwilling to consider other explanations, and they don't want anyone else to, they're always repeating these stupid slogans to keep people from thinking. It's the same disgusting pattern as communists or anyone else that wants to take control out of your hands and push the ideology that they've become useful idiots for, they're not even thinking for themselves, it's like a botnet. (This is why I kind of like Judge Dread's "meme malware" idea, but I wish he did a better job of explaining it, because I didn't have a clue what the hell he meant for at least a year after I first heard it.)

Anyway, it's depressing to see someone surrender their mind like that, and then try to push it on other people.

@p @Countermeasures

Your thesis that one simply can't generalize about races etc.implies that all of the people thruout history, going back to Roman days if not before, who say that Jews everyhere create an ethnic mafia hostile to all humans (who they call "Goyim") and detrimental to any society they infiltrate, is wrong. I contend that in addition to this weight of opinion which you dismiss, there is abundant, even overwhelming historical evidence. It was for example starkly evident in the runup to the Iraq War-crime. And to suggest it wasn't starkly evident in Weimar Germany is to dismiss probably a majority of the German people as deluded psychopaths: I invoke Occam's Razor and claim they were probably right.

You didn't include the mountains of evidence in your post, @TradeMinister, so all you did is shout at @p. He's now even less interested in the mountain of evidence and will studiously avoid it. He absolutely will not read Baruch Levy's letter to Karl Marx confessing that since the 1800s or before jews were already planning White Genocide and how to achieve it. It's probably a forgery anyway because Whites are possessed by the devil and compelled to persecute jews for no reason whatsoever spontaneously in every way they can conceive of (or Satan can inspire them). @Countermeasures

@WhitesAdvocate @TradeMinister @Countermeasures Kill whitey, hail Satan, I'm not buying what you are selling.

What is there to sell? Blacks voted at an 87 percent rate for Biden. Despite being only 13 percent of the population, they commit 56% of violent crimes where race of perp or known. Race predicts basically everything IN AGGREGATE.

Your point that your results might be a little spotty if you zoom in on one black and monitor him is stupid and completely misses the point, the point being what sort of environment Whites want their progeny growing up in (that is, a nigger free environment). It's also mostly wrong. I can predict all sorts of things reliably about a random individual black. He'll eat junk food and drink soda today. He'll wake up after noon. He'll play video games on a console. He'll smoke weed and get drunk. He probably won't commit a major victimful crime TODAY, but his meter is filling, and if I watch him every day for a month, the likelihood I'll see one is high.

Do you personally know one of the 12% of blacks with an IQ above 100? Is he also pretty well-behaved? CONGRATULATIONS. We're sending him back with the rest, so cherish him while you have him.

@p @Countermeasures @TradeMinister

@WhitesAdvocate "These cars practically sell themselves!"

I told you I'm not buying, you goddamn fed.

Do you have any idea what the feds are up to these days? https://national-justice.com/current-events/national-justice-investigates-inside-department-homeland-securitys-plan-crush-you

@WhitesAdvocate Go re-read my series of five points, any of which is enough to reject what you've got to say, but I've got all of them. Then read and re-read the part where if a guy refuses to stop bothering me with that, he's some kind of asshole and I'm not buying. While I'm here, I might as well point out that you've said nothing that I haven't already heard.

So why bother me instead of peddling this garbage elsewhere, given that I've asked you not to bother me with this and I'm not going to care? What are you trying to accomplish?

Are you White, @p?

@WhitesAdvocate Who gives a shit?

You give enough of a shit to conceal it. That's extremely abnormal behavior. @p

@WhitesAdvocate You dodged my questions, so why should I give a shit about your question? You ask that as if it's relevant, as if I should dance when you say. Fuck off with that, answer my goddamn questions.

Imagine this response if I asked you any other question.

What's your favorite Linux distribution?
>You ask that as if it's relevant, as if I should dance when you say.

You're unhealthily obsessed with race, @p.

@WhitesAdvocate If I'm asking who broke my coffee mug and you say "Hey, what's your favorite Linux distribution?" then, you goddamn idiot, "You ask that as if it's relevant" is the expected response.

No, it's just chit-chat while you wait for other responses. I could ask you your race tomorrow apropos of nothing, and you'll still conceal it. @p

@WhitesAdvocate Answer my question: what the fuck are you trying to accomplish?

Nothing in particular. If I see anyone say anything for which the answer is kike or nigger, I say kike or nigger. When he denies it, I substantiate it. You get all personal about it and take it down weird paths. @p

@WhitesAdvocate Sales tactic. "Hey, man, no need to get upset, I'm just trying to be friendly. If you don't want to (join our cult|own the nation's number-one selling four-door sedan|give a Vietnam vet a dollar|change your long-distance service) then that's fine."

Answer my question: what the fuck are you trying to accomplish?

Same as everyone on the Alt-Right. Averting White Genocide. @p

@WhitesAdvocate Only an idiot spends his time where it's clearly not productive. I'm not buying and you're more likely to get me to think you people should be rounded up than you are to get me to sign up for your bullshit by recycling tired lines at me. Go bother someone that's more gullible. I've got better shit to do with my time and I'm not signing up.

So you (or anyone) post your sixth-grade anti-racist drivel. I'll reply with something enlightening. Anyone reading the thread will see you're a proper antiracist and go off on their own to learn about nigger crime and the jews. Everyone wins. No need for you to protest to me that you're an antiracist for life. @p

@WhitesAdvocate I've told you to fuck off with that because I'm not interested in hearing it, and "It's your fault for noticing" is laughable. If your goal is to inject low-effort propaganda at every opportunity, I remember what I did last time. I don't care what you post, I said not to bother me with this shit. Are you capable of not bothering me with this shit or do you need help?

I'll just keep doing what I always do. If you happen to be the one posting something requiring a jew naming response, it'll be your post to which I reply naming the jew. That's how free discourse on the web works. @p

@WhitesAdvocate I banned @Nobody for this but now that I think about this line for a second:

> If you happen to be the one posting something requiring a jew naming response, it'll be your post to which I reply naming the jew. That's how free discourse on the web works.

If you happen to be the one posting something requiring trap gifs, then it'll be your post to which I reply with a lot of trap gifs. That's how free discourse on the web works.

Thanks for the warning. I'll remember not to click to view your sensitive content. @p @Nobody

@WhitesAdvocate I like your optimism, I won't be tagging it. Enjoy.

Porn isn't speech, by the way. I never got the "trap" distinction, but if it's possible for a trap to be passable, I hope you'll at least show me that degree of mercy. @p

@WhitesAdvocate Spam isn't speech.

I never spam. My posts are always tailored. @p

@WhitesAdvocate Shitting up every thread definitely is spam.

If you and the boys were discussing Plan 9 and I jumped in with the jews, you'd have a case. But in fact, I never spam. My posts are always germane. @p

@WhitesAdvocate You've got some sort of disease where you think everything is connected to Jews, so fuck off with that "it's germane" shit.

https://m.jpost.com/US-Elections/US-Jews-contribute-half-of-all-donations-to-the-Democratic-party-468774 @p

@WhitesAdvocate All right, can't say I didn't warn you.

@p @WhitesAdvocate
Did you seriously ban him for pointing out that Jews contribute 50% of all Democrat funding?

@MaleGoddess @WhitesAdvocate No, I banned him for cramming that shit everywhere. He was posting that to demonstrate that he didn't plan to stop.

@p @MaleGoddess @WhitesAdvocate It's hard to get exact numbers, but I believe Sailer estimated that around 75% of big-money donors to the Dems are Jewish, while it's around 55% for the GOP.

@ArdanianRight @MaleGoddess @WhitesAdvocate Yeah, I don't really have any opinion on that (if you correct for total household income, it might be interesting to see), that was just him flipping the bird on his way out.
im_not_touching_you.mp4