@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
You say that is if being dangerous was a bad thing.
being able to back your will with action is what makes action not necessary. Docile people will suffer more in the long run.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
Your capacity for violence constitution your constitution. Without it, you have no rights.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
The worst case of jewish trickery that had been done was to to pursuade everyone to believe that rights are universal and inalienable.
I am not talking about identity and I have no idea why do you think identity plays a role in this shit. It does not change the facts that when there is no recorse for breaking your rights, they no longer exist.
@Emperor1 @cowanon@neckbeard.xyz @CharlytheWorm @EmmaFaber @ananda
Alright. I get what you're trying to say. But let's be real here. We live in a society so afraid to put their lives on line, that we killed the economy and put most of the population in "pods" as well as accepting the idea of becoming a lab rat.
You intelectualizing about violence being dangerous is like going to one of the legendary african villages and protesting giving them food because obesity is not healthy.
unless it is existentially necessary to prove your opinion with violence
because you capacity for violence constitutes your identity