I am not sure how common this is, but I do tend to judge people's opinions based on their weakest argument.
For instance, if you want to tell me, that covid is a fraud, and as an evidence you present changing GDC guidelines, sudden decreases in flu cases, censorship on social media and the fact, that some test failed, when you tested a kiwi...
How the fuck am I supposed to take you seriously if you included such a retarded argument? Did you put as much thought and research to each of your arguments as you did to the last one??? seriously???
@coyote
Thanks.
Now, would you mind exaining to me why do people believe I am not concerned?
@coyote
ok. I thought that after more then an year of people venting in here, it would not be such a hot issue...
That's what I get for being autistic ![]()
Like, for instance, doctors advocating for vitamin D, Zinc, vitamin C, or even well-researched antivirals like Ivermectin are being censored without an actual scientific basis. It looks *very* bad.