Dude, its official, parents are fucking retards. People who have kids exist on the lower end of the IQ spectrum. They are the primary danger to their own spawn, and in more cases than not should have them taking away. I wouldn’t suggest they be raised by the state, the most abusive parent of all, but I pray to KKKthulhu for an alien race of perfect nannies to rescue the poor bastards. Talk about save the planet. #covid19
(source: my college ebook)
@NEETzsche Propagandized into vaccinating their kids against preventable illness? What part of the illuminate’s master plan is that??
@lavaender The part where they tell what specifically to think instead of teaching you critical thinking skills and other things that let you think for yourself.
@NEETzsche They tell you whats occurring in reality, and give you the option to protect yourself**. Its up to you if you what to die from depression era illnesses, but to willfully put your kids through that is just fucked.
@lavaender >They tell you whats occurring in reality
Yeah, uh, about that. What’s up for discussion with the vaxx vs anti-vaxx debate, is what is reality. You don’t get to just assert that your side is right and then act like the debate ends there. It doesn’t work that way. That’s not how science works. Honestly, that’s not how epistemoogy works in general.
I’m not even a blanket anti-vaxxer like @Eris appears to be and this is pathetic. This mRNA shit they have in the coronachan “vaccines” uses an experimental technique, which is to say it might work fine, it might do nothing, and it might make you grow a third arm. While things like the polio and measles vaccines may have shown to be “safe and effective,” that doesn’t apply to all vaccines and all techniques at making vaccines now and forever. Piggybacking off of the good reputation of things like the measles/polio/etc vaccines to push some new shit that doesn’t even really qualify not only fails to push the thing you want to push, but it retroactively tarnishes the good reputation of those past things.
You commies started by ruining works of fiction with good reputations like Lord of the Rings and Star Wars by inserting your obvious bullshit into them, and now you’ve moved on to ruining entire professions like medicine, law, and science.
@travis >WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS SHIT
I think the point is to gradually diminish the natural immune system of victims, in particular to respiratory diseases but to some extent just in general. It would be subtle enough that people aren’t keeling over right after their first or second shot, but effective enough to offer an overall stymie to the victims.
Imagine you’re in one of those grand strategy games and you have a disease that offers a -15% production on your enemy’s people. I think, from the perspective of the powers that be using it on us, that’s the goal.
The point is to legitimize a brahmin caste of 'experts' with sovereign maternal stewardship over their serfs. You have to be convinced that being a slave is good for you.
@Eris @lavaender @NEETzsche @travis That’s the most plausible reason after “colossal money grab” imho. I don’t buy that “the elites” would willingly poison their most obedient serfs, unless they could sell the antidote, I suppose.
@ademan >I don’t buy that “the elites” would willingly poison their most obedient serfs
I do. Especially since they’re pushing for coronachan vaccines mandates, which means you either get it or you don’t eat. In other words, some people are likely to cave in spite of having a defiant streak. Furthermore, this presupposes that you aren’t a conquered people who are being weakened prior to a more direct takeover.
After the fall of Nazi Germany, American and Soviet occupiers of Germany deliberately starved the population in a controlled fashion by keeping their calorie intake to around 1250 calories per day. A normal human needs 2000 calories per day to be healthy. The purpose was to keep them too hungry to revolt. The occupiers went as far as to deliberately destroy leftovers etc to forbid ethnic Germans in Europe from having enough to eat.
Why not use that sort of technique, except do it surreptitiously? It seems like a natural development from last century, where instead of it being a matter of conventional war it’s now approached as a matter of espionage.
>Furthermore, this presupposes that you aren’t a conquered people who are being weakened prior to a more direct takeover.
This is the most fundamental mistake people make when they get 'redpilled.'
We are not 'losing,' we have lost. We are an occupied people. You're not trying to prevent a takeover, you're trying to cause one.
@travis >Can we all just stop participating?
Yes. In fact, a slim majority have participated in the first place. 54% are “fully vaccinated.” Those two shots don’t cut it for their plans, though, and so plenty of opportunity is present for them to defect.
I’m going to give a more optimistic take than others are relying on. I doin’t think we already lost. I think they’re trying to tie up loose ends and put the final kibosh on us, but I don’t think they’re necessarily succeeding. I also think that the fact that they’re getting more overt as time goes on is a sign of desperation; the general approach to post-WW2 population control has been to become progressively subtler, not more overt. The fact that they’re getting overt means they’re going off their own reservation.
III Attack by Stratagem
Sun Tzu said: In the practical art of war, the best thing of all is to take the enemy’s country whole and intact; to shatter and destroy it is not so good. So, too, it is better to recapture an army entire than to destroy it, to capture a regiment, a detachment or a company entire than to destroy them.
Hence to fight and conquer in all your battles is not supreme excellence; supreme excellence consists in breaking the enemy’s resistance without fighting.
Thus the highest form of generalship is to balk the enemy’s plans; the next best is to prevent the junction of the enemy’s forces; the next in order is to attack the enemy’s army in the field; and the worst policy of all is to besiege walled cities.
Right now, extreme social pressure is being applied to convince people to get these “vaccines.” They are being threatened with their livelihoods. They are being threatened with ostracization from family. They are being threatened with a lot of things. Those who don’t want to get the “vaccine,” really don’t want that fucking “vaccine.” Yet in spite of this, they get a measly 54% to actually agree to it; and that’s going by CDC numbers, which might be artificially inflated to make it look more popular and appealing than it really is.
If we go by Sun Tzu’s thinking, they are engaging in the worst, most desperate policy. They are besieging the walled cities that we call our souls.
@NEETzsche @lavaender @Eris @travis @ademan
The 54 percent is truly amazing, considering that:
1) Most people were not afraid of vaccines mere 2 years ago.
2) It is ridiculously easy to just get the jab. It requires no will nor brain.
3) People are being activelly blackmailed to get it
Something had broken in people. This is not a normal reaction. Sheeple should have listened, since it was not a hard decision. The Cathedral is loosing it's grip fast.
@travis @lavaender @NEETzsche @Eris @ademan
Yeah, there always were some people afraid of pointless vaxing, but with all of the artificial paranoya, you would expect to get at least 87 percent.
@LukeAlmighty @NEETzsche @Eris @travis @ademan Seeing as how most people werent afraid of vaxxing 2 years ago - doesnt that go to show that all the hysteria now is artificial, and politically motivated?