It’s a great reply because it highlights how activists conflate sex and gender when it’s convenient.
Those terms used to be understood as synonymous, but then “sexologists” Mr. Money tried to differentiate them, and tried to prove this differentiation by forcing boys to live as girls, and as we would later discover by forcing them to perform sex acts with each other.
You would think “the guy who tried to differentiate gender from sex turned out to be a pedophile, and both of the subjects used for his “proof” ended up killing themselves”, would be sufficient to shut down this line of inquiry, but it wasn’t, because the whitewashed version of his work was convenient for the AGPs of the day.
Now, in 2022, you’ve got this guy who is trying to present himself as the closest thing we have to a real-life Tony Stark, confusing sex and gender. And his confusion is understandable, because gender cranks conflate the two so they can make equivocal arguments.
@dave
I had no problem when these activists were talking about "gender expression", because the fact you express differently in spite of your gender would be an interesting and nondestructive concept.
But the moment they dropped the word "expression", they tried a slide of hand, that was so unbelievably stupid, it will destroy their entire pyramid of pseudoscience.
