As in I tend to have viewpoints and support policies that an American would consider to be "on the left". In favor of universal healthcare, progressive taxation, social safety nets (unemployment, welfare, etc.), strong anti-discrimination laws, anti-poverty programs, etc.
Culturally I tend to identify more with the left too since I'm not religious and I think government policy should be data-driven and based in good science, also I think the justice system should have a significantly stronger focus on rehabilitation rather than continuing to be as punitive and ineffective at preventing recidivism as it is.
Where I deviate from a lot of leftists is that I like libertarian principles (even though I don't consider myself one) and I'm in favor of the freedom for anyone to express their views, even if some people consider those views offensive.
Culturally I tend to identify more with the left too since I'm not religious and I think government policy should be data-driven and based in good science, also I think the justice system should have a significantly stronger focus on rehabilitation rather than continuing to be as punitive and ineffective at preventing recidivism as it is.
Where I deviate from a lot of leftists is that I like libertarian principles (even though I don't consider myself one) and I'm in favor of the freedom for anyone to express their views, even if some people consider those views offensive.
>strong anti-discrimination laws
(Except when they benefit Whites, men, Christians, or non-fags)
It has been almost a month and a half and you're seriously still repeating the same flawed argument? That I don't believe mass murder of innocent people is justified in response to it does not mean I don't oppose it.
There are zero flaws in my argument. You were outed as supporting literal extermination and sexual slavery if the racial roles are reversed, a position you have yet to actually backpedal on for some reason, because to do so would mean that the Haitian Revolution is invalidated by the methods used.
You literally do not get to play anything remotely resembling a race card until you fix this.
You literally do not get to play anything remotely resembling a race card until you fix this.
> if the racial roles are reversed
Oh, that's what it is! I was trying to figure out why there were duplicate wikipedia articles titled "Buffalo Shooting" and "Haitian Revolution", but they're not actually duplicates. With the "Haitian Revolution", the mass shooter was black.
Oh, that's what it is! I was trying to figure out why there were duplicate wikipedia articles titled "Buffalo Shooting" and "Haitian Revolution", but they're not actually duplicates. With the "Haitian Revolution", the mass shooter was black.
>i can find a difference, therefore whatever similarities you’re drawing from go away
No.
Not just "a difference", NEETzsche. To claim that the reason I believe the Haitian Revolution was justified, but not the Buffalo Shooting, is because the races were swapped, is a ridiculous strawman.
@dave @NEETzsche @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
Say a single genocide made by white people that was justified then. 
Beat me to it, damnit
@NEETzsche @dave @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
great minds think alike...
@LukeAlmighty should we impose a hard time limit on his opportunity to dispute this theory, which has scientific stature, of his racial violence views? Since he loves to dodge the fuck out of these matters.
Follow
@NEETzsche @Mek101 @Hyolobrika @bonifartius
Let him do a research. I am sure @dave is going through wikipedia right now looking for a datapoint that fits his specific criteria 
So, there's no need to push him.
Let's give him a reply limit instead. He can reply to up to two (2) posts before he replies to this theory. Two posts past this one. If he's actually searching for that data point, he won't be spending time arguing with everybody else about everything else.
