What???
Mobile Firefox is STILL unable to install most extensions?

That's just pointless then.

@LukeAlmighty uBlock Origin works in both versions of Firefox... but only on desktop Chrome

Follow

@waltercool @js290
Because until 15 minutes ago, I didn't know of any alternative with a significant advantage

Google Chrome is basically a spyware, you shouldn't use it, unless you don't care about privacy.

Mozilla Firefox is crap at phone, it's slow at computer and phone, also Firefox is insecure by default and Mozilla can't be trusted.

I would suggest to go for Bromite or similar at phone, it's basically Google Chrome without any Google crap. Same with Ungoogled-Chromium at desktop.

Nah, moved away from Brave.

1.- Can’t build it by myself, it takes over 40GB to do a successful build. Firefox takes ~5GB, Chrome takes ~9GB. 2.- No distro supports Brave. Not even F-Droid supports Brave due insane amount of resources. 3.- Brave as-a-company are nasty. https://www.theverge.com/2020/6/8/21283769/brave-browser-affiliate-links-crypto-privacy-ceo-apology 4.- They don’t support ARM platforms except Android. 5.- Their Android app uses Google’s SafelyNet. https://github.com/brave/brave-browser/issues/15344#issuecomment-842798066

@waltercool @wolfi @js290 @LukeAlmighty i still use soyzilla for most tasks and chromium to run discord. :\
> Links 2020 issue that was a legit mistake.
> Zero problems now.
> tells people to stay away anyway.
You're building brave wrong if it takes 40GB. RTFM.
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @wolfi @js290
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @wolfi @js290 Thank you for finding two people that don't know how to use git if their lives depended on it. 😆

Arch PKGBUILD is about 27GB.
That's nice, it's 3 times what it takes me to build Chromium at Gentoo, or 6 times Firefox.
I only compile/build on RAM only lmao. I don't like to waste SSD/NVME cycles.

And not getting a 64GB RAM setup lol

@waltercool @LukeAlmighty Bromite also has some of the uBlock Origin features built in

@waltercool @js290
Privacy is an issue of such insignificance, it's hard to even start explaining.

First, it's not my problem directly. I don't feel any pain from being watched.
Second, securing my data would generate a ton of inconvenience for my daily usage.
Third, All of data about me would be leaked by people in my proximity, who don't care about privacy either.

I wasn't able to persuade my own mother of a single rule. "Just don't upload my photos on facebook". A simple rule designed especially to be of least inconvenience to her. But she doesn't care, even if she knows I cared about this rule a lot.

I mean, that's my point, if you don't care about privacy, any browser is OK, the faster with smaller memory footprint, the better.

@waltercool @js290
I didn't say that I don't care.
It is just in the last level of requirements, far behind function, speed and morality.

@waltercool @js290
The problem with privacy is that it's kinda too late.

It's like diving to the wreckage of Titanic, to say: Hey, I think this ship is going to sink.

Or going to Twitter and say: Wait a minute, what if that birth control pill is going to have an effect on social stability?

It's impossible to fix it, but it's possible to reduce the impact.

The only solution for 100% privacy is going without cookies and javascript like GNUtards, which is ridiculous.
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @js290 you can kinda get by with a VPN (mullvad) and set the browser to wipe cookies on session's end.
I tried that, but it's unpractical to wipe cookies on session end.

Doing log in each time I visit a website is egghhh. Also makes more user/pass transactions over internet.
The other solution would be keeping cookies from only websites you care, ignore others.
@waltercool @js290 @LukeAlmighty i just checked and falkon doesn't seem to allow selective deletion.

i could have sworn firefox does but this might be an extension.

i mean all forms of security require some amount of mindfulness. appealing to people's radical laziness is how big tech got here to begin with.
Falkon would be Perfect, if they would support parallel threads.

Not everyone likes threads on browsers, but I do, it avoids lot of issues with multitabs
@icedquinn @LukeAlmighty @js290 @waltercool

> could have sworn firefox does but this might be an extension.

there's a way to do it but it requires jumping through hoops
@icedquinn @LukeAlmighty @js290 @waltercool gotta get to the site settings menu from the url bar (only in desktop iirc)
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @js290
If you want privacy hardened fire fox is the way to go for mr
While Firefox offers a smaller memory footprint, it's kinda slow in comparison to Chromium based browsers.

Can't remember the exact reason why stopped using Firefox, maybe problems trying to get HW acceleration at Linux. They keep breaking and re-fixing that.
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @js290
That's true, any chrome based browsers you'd recommend? Honestly I think every web browser sucks
@waltercool @LukeAlmighty @js290
I remember the first time I installed chrome I was 10 and I was using an old iMac my father gave me I think chrome was out for a month at that point, it was still on WebKit at the time, little did I know I was using the product that ruined everything

@waltercool @js290
It reminds me of the time Duck Duck go said, that Privacy was the primary reason people were using it as a Google alternative.

Halarious :alexjonessmile2:

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Game Liberty Mastodon

Mainly gaming/nerd instance for people who value free speech. Everyone is welcome.