@bot @feld
Please, be kind when responding. I will attempt to phrase my thoughts as well as I can, but I understand, that this is a sensitive topic.
Before we start, I am obviously an atheist. I believe, that the life I am living now is the only life I will ever experience. I also believe, that both suffering and prosperity of others is our collective responsibility as a civilization. No God will bring us Haven, but we can live a good life that we have.
So, the heaven/hell idea makes it, so people will not take this life seriously. Instead of working as hard as possible to improve this life, they have a much more important task of keeping the invisible morality points high enough to enjoy the real life, that will begin after their death.
Does this make sense?
@bot @feld
Noone in here supports globohomo
But to the point, I did not say “just let people enjoy things”. That is not how I see the world. I say, that our lives are our highest responsibility. That is kinda the true oposite, since watching people destroy their lives is watching them destroy their entire existence, and hurt society as a whole.
@bot @feld
Of course I do understand the corelation that you've mentioned. I just don't believe, that there actually is a causation between atheism and complete degeneracy.
Of course, saying, that the most degenerate person I've seen was a christian won't be a persuasive argument to you, but I've seen many christiand, and I really don't see them being more moral then the atheists.
Either way, back you your original question @bot . While I do know, that there are christians, who did reach their beliefs rationally, I still think, that a HUGE proportion of christians did choose that belief because their brain couldn't handle either the thought of death, or the thought of life being "that bad".
And people like that end up spending 60 minutes on fediverse arguing, that I am a nihilist for enjoying a good life. Because this life is meaningless, and they are just waiting for their death and following reward.
@ArdainianRight @victor @feld
@ChristiJunior
@victor @feld @LukeAlmighty @bot That's completely opposite. Things are meaningful when they're rare
@applejack @victor @feld @bot
I would still rather be immortal, but ok.
@LukeAlmighty @victor @feld @bot That's not really the point
If you live forever then this life has 0 relative worth.
@applejack @victor @feld @bot
Time? Yes.
But the world itself is changing, so each moment would still be unique. So, the meaning of life would still exist.
And yes, I know it wasn't the point.
@LukeAlmighty @victor @feld @bot Meaning is relative
If you divide it over infinity it doesn't exist
@applejack @victor @feld @bot
Maybe, I haven't tried it.