@WoodshopHandman @Shadowman311
> How exactly would the government clean something up that has already seeped into the ground?
Simple:
@WoodshopHandman @Shadowman311
It is the single best solution, because it limits the chance of this ever repeating by 95 percent.
But sure... A slap on the wirst, an apology tour and a fine the size of 1/100th of their daily income will do the same... -_-
@WoodshopHandman @Shadowman311
If you have a proof of this being a sabotage, then obviously, the fault is elsewhere.
But in case of industrial "accidents", they are always (no exceptions) a result of 20 previous "yolo" fast solutions.
@WoodshopHandman @Shadowman311
Ok, enjoy the budget cuts followed by a quick apology and move on, if this is the society you like.
@WoodshopHandman @Shadowman311
Of course I seem retarded to you, if your philosophy is based around axioms "shit happens", "I like society where shit happens" and "preventative solutions are a spook".
I believe, that laws exist to outline actions, that should not happen under any circumstance.
We have laws around flying toys that weight too much punishable by fine, that most people cannot repay in their lives, so why the fuck is it a stratch to make actions that do lead to a chernobile-sized event punishable by death?