I didn't think I would say this, but Matt Walsh (although a daily wire slave), is starting to gain some of my respect.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=23QThcOyUsA

This is the chad original video:
"You're still a man, just not one that any of us can respect"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h02TFnsxHYc

@Corfiot
Human deepfake

Now, that is brutal

The daily wire is ramping it up, testing the waters. After the scandal with crowder they need to prove they're not out for themselves. Bring popcorn.

@Corfiot
Well, the daily wire has a ton of shit to prove... But why not.

If they start pushing hard, I won't complain :D

@Corfiot
But they still tollerate people like Little Ben, so I don't have much faith in them. And I don't even want to know what kind of leverage they used to bend JP backwards.

I'm not familiar with their full range, if by Little Ben you mean Ben Shapiro, I don't watch his show at all. I can't stand his voice. We'll see about DailyWire. They must have taken a hit to their growth with the crowder story, they need to do something and I doubt Ben can ever leave DailyWire, isn't he a founder there?

As of JP, he's spinning out ever since his drug crisis, he is giving off old man vibes

@Corfiot
Just check the first part.
I think that covers perfectly, why I cannot trust anything from daily wire, while he's there.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh_s2BHqeEc

>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mh_s2BHqeEc
Well, Jew gets ruffled over statements criticizing Jews. Big surprise. If you believe DailyWire is about Jewish interests and Jews are behind all the trans shit, too, it's likely that DW is ramping up the non-jew conservative issues to divert conservative attention and outrage into the part of their agenda that is less important for them (trans). In either case, the trans ideology must be resisted anyway.

Hearing him talk about antisemitism is... well, hmm I mean he has a right to defend himself and his people but it feels like he's wielding a weapon, not just criticizing. He says "it's antisemitic", as if this is somehow worse than most things, has more weight, more importance than other bad things. And he's trying to be "forgiving" and thinks to himself "well, maybe it's not THAT BAD, hmm, no it is, after all, antisemitic". Is he entitled to assume this, in current society, or is it hubris and personal interest making it more important for him personally?

I'm considering a thought experiment: Imagine someone being anti-children, like really REALLY hating children. Is he worse or better than an anti-human person that hates all adult humans except kids? So, is it the absolute numbers that define the pecking order? Then it's "better" to hate the kids. Is it the morality of it? Then it's "better" to hate the adults. Is it "better" to have raped 1 person or to have killed 5? 6? 2? Probably lawyers learn about this, how does justice decide relative sentences? I need to read more on this