@Shadowman311
cc @dave
This os the exact kind of thing I meant, when I said, that parity with doctors diagnosis is not a goal you should be aiming for.
@Shadowman311 @dave
Or in other way:
Every single smart guy on the planet knew the humans cannot fly, until one idiot thought different.
I do want an AI to make its own deductions, not the same one as the experts.
How are you going to get data for training it. AI is not magic. It just find patterns in data.
@rysertio @dave @Shadowman311 
I have no idea what kind of data do doctors have available.
I am also not an AI scientist. All I know is, that AI data needs to be as clear as possible, and if the data is trained against expert diagnosis, then it cannot possibly surpass it.
@jmw150 @dave @Shadowman311
Yes.
But that is, because you can train AI easilly on scans, and the "alive" field 3 years later 
(or, a binary and quite measurable result)
@jmw150 @dave @Shadowman311
The problem I am taking about with expert data is, that all 3 doctors I mentioned in my previous post believe that they did a good job.