@moffintosh
Hear me out...
We all do agree once you correct for the language.
@moffintosh
So, what part do you disagree with?
@moffintosh
Here is my problem with that thesis.
Money won't do anything, when the banks can just deny your access.
I believe, that the problem is a very small and isolated group of mafians. These people have a huge in group racial bias, making most of them jews, but not making most jews part of this group.
If there is a group, who controls the banks and the government, AND they siphon money from everyone using donations, subsidies, etc (moneyprinter goes burrrr method), then no matter how rich, american, jewish or governmental you are as long as you are not part of that group.
That is ironically enough, why we see all the Trump trials. While he was rich and politician, he was not part of the group, so he is being targeted by all the legal force they can gather. Same happened to Kanye once he spoke against them etc.
Is capitalism itself exploitative? Yes. And that can be solved later. But no capitalist can beat the power of one central money printer.
Money won't do anything, when the banks can just deny your access.
Simple redistribution isn't what I or any marxist proposes as a solution, if that what's concerning you.
I believe, that the problem is a very small and isolated group of mafians. These people have a huge in group racial bias, making most of them jews, but not making most jews part of this group.
If there is a group, who controls the banks and the government, AND they siphon money from everyone using donations, subsidies, etc (moneyprinter goes burrrr method), then no matter how rich, american, jewish or governmental you are as long as you are not part of that group.
That is ironically enough, why we see all the Trump trials. While he was rich and politician, he was not part of the group, so he is being targeted by all the legal force they can gather. Same happened to Kanye once he spoke against them etc.
While it is indeed true that at the current state of things there is a small group at the head of the system, you shouldn't confuse that group with the system itself. Before WW2 there was still rampant infighting between western capitalists who were co.peting for dominance. However with the destruction of europe due to WW2, the baricenter of capital moved west to the USA, whit the european capitalists ending up being subservient to them.
These people have a huge in group racial bias, making most of them jews, but not making most jews part of this group.
There is a big problem with that theory though: nazi germany.
With the revolution in germany having failed (see "Red Bavaria"), the NSDAP only became a dominant force after it obtained support from the german industrial class.
If the group which is at the head of capitalism is made of primarely jews, why in the world would they pick a ferocious antisemite as a means to repress anti-capitalist forces???
But no capitalist can beat the power of one central money printer.
But they basically own the money printers. Inflation going up in the west corresponded with record profits for large corporations for a reason. If the money printers and capitalists were antagonistic, why the action of the former correspond with a grow of wealth for the other?
@moffintosh
> But they basically own the money printers. Inflation going up in the west corresponded with record profits for large corporations for a reason. If the money printers and capitalists were antagonistic, why the action of the former correspond with a grow of wealth for the other?
Who owns the money? The few people, who get all the benefits of money printers.
They do not ""earn money using profit"". They do earn that money using direct investments through Blackrock and similar groups that get the money straight from the printer.
There is a meme about this, that when a company fails, the company goes bankrupt. When a bank fails, the tax payer goes bankrupt. (because the government gives them a bailout)
That is how you know the difference. A capitalist can go bankrupt. A part of the mafia cannot.
@moffintosh
> Simple redistribution isn't what I or any marxist proposes as a solution, if that what's concerning you.
No, my point was different.
It was, that you do not own your money. You are landed money. You have only as much money, as they allow you to have. Do they want you to have 10 percent less every year? They just print and cause inflation. If they want you to have none, they freeze your account.
Do you see why that is a huge problem for me?