@moffintosh @dcc
> Complains about rich people using money to get more money
> Refuses to complain about state giving the rich even more money without offering you anything.
I don't get you man.
Refuses to complain about state giving the rich even more money without offering you anything.
I just don't do it as much because the capital owners control it anyway, and by getting rid of them one gets two birds with one stone
@LukeAlmighty @dcc Capitalism has nonracial character, expecially in the last 40 years
@moffintosh @dcc
The worst thing about racism is, that it doesn't matter how non-racist you are, as long as the others don't see you as part of their group.
And the jews in the government do see themselves as part of Israel more, then part of the country they rule over.
@LukeAlmighty
You seem to assume that it's limited to jews and motivated by racial interests, skipping over the fact that this is done to keep israel aligned with the US/west, which in turn is done to keep a guard on middle estern contries selling their oil in anything else than US dollars. This keeps the demand for US dollars high which allows the country to run on massive deficits and keep financing it's capitalist class
@moffintosh
> You seem to assume that it's limited to jews and motivated by racial interests
"motivated by racial interests"
YES
"limited to jews"
Who owns the money printers?
![]()
@moffintosh
Also:
> allows the country to run on massive deficits and keep financing it's capitalist class
And that is exactly the issue. Deficit is a different word for money printing. Because the deficit is towards the central bank. (That is a word play made to hide the fact, that the central banks are direct cause of inflation)
@moffintosh
If there was no money printing, the economy would look quite different :D
That is a word play made to hide the fact, that the central banks are A direct cause of inflation
If there was no money printing, the economy would look quite different :D
The boom 'n' bust cicle would be more accentuated, just give a look to history prior the global abandonment of the gold standard.
Voluntary infkation with money printing is but a bandage on the falling rate of profit
@moffintosh
Yes.
And I say, that is is prefferable to all of my money being taken away through the inflation.
@LukeAlmighty That doesn't solve the problem with capitalism though😂
@moffintosh
As far, as I understand your side, the problem with capitalism is, that people with money can force you to give them your money through bad trade conditions.
But a money printer is this problem on steroids. They steal value of your money.... even without any need for your agreement.
As far, as I understand your side, the problem with capitalism is, that people with money can force you to give them your money through bad trade conditions.
That is... partial.
In a small summary: production is a social activity yet the fruits of labor are for only the owners, market instability blows up the economy periodically destroying livelyhoods of millions, labor rights are in antithesis to the economic system, the moneyed get to control the government and state and use it for their own interests, skrew the majority of the population, it consumes the environment driving us closer to a climate catastrophe (which will send my extended family's homes underwater, destroy the economy and cause millions of refugees), alienation from one's job, consumerism, wars to control foreign markets and resources, fragmentation of community and society and so on and so forth...
But a money printer is this problem on steroids. They steal value of your money.... even without any need for your agreement.
Using a Beretta instead of a Lock, they already didn't have my permission, the difference is minuscule.
@moffintosh
> production is a social activity yet the fruits of labor are for only the owners
I have no idea where did this come from. ![]()
@moffintosh
If I got partial ownership of the company, my ability to vote would contribute 0,0002 percent of decision power.
As of now, it's 0...
I am really not trying to be smug, but do you SERIOUSLY care about 0.0002%? Is that the issue for you?
@moffintosh
> Plus, in a democratic workplace, if your proposals are popular enough and you aren't completely incompetent you can always run for management or the administration board.
I am there tp work, not to be a politician.
> It's less about the single me and more about the workers as a whole.
Why do you assime, that I have anything in comon with the retards I work with?
@moffintosh
The employer cares about ME personally, because I gave a huge part of my life trying to be useful.
HR Karren cares about her dog more then about my life.
We are not the same, and I want her to have her have as little of an effect on my ability to earn a living as possible.
I can talk to my boss. I cannot talk to 500 feminist retards.
HR Karren cares about her dog more then about my life.
Then vote her out
The employer cares about ME personally, because I gave a huge part of my life trying to be useful.
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@LukeAlmighty It's less about the single me and more about the workers as a whole. Everyone prefers to work less and less hard for example, something which goes in direct contrast with the interest of the owners.
Plus, in a democratic workplace, if your proposals are popular enough and you aren't completely incompetent you can always run for management or the administration board.
Common interests shared by the workers emerge and can then be implemented.