This is one way where English is superior to other European languages. Having "gender"-assigned articles in the structure of language was never something I thought about being a gateway to societal trannyism but maybe it was overlooked lmao
A joke, of course, but I guess you could be hyper specific about the old usage of the term with regards to language and classification. Gender has nothing to do with sexual proclivities even if the modern left wants us to believe so. It might be an uphill battle to try to distinguish that point constantly to midwits so I'll continue just attacking the word anytime it is used wrong regardless of setting.
You lost me again. I get why the Pokémon groomers would use the word "gender" to groom kids but why are you suggesting that the word is used correctly? It's still wrong even if they're evil and it exposes them. Gender is a classification term from the old days that had nothing to do with sexual expression unto John Money came around. Where is the communication gap here?
From the rest of the conversation, I take it that English isn't your first language. In English, to anybody who isn't a modern faggot, nothing has genders except for nouns themselves. Nobody prior to the groomers described sexual proclivities outside of the mainstream as anything besides "perverted". Oh, you're a women who identified as a man? You're still a sex: female. Cross dressing dude? Sex: male. Gender as a word was not used here by any normal person to classify anything aside from foreign language.
I'm not missing much if that's your level of reading comprehension. I really want to give you the benefit of the doubt here and attribute this misunderstanding to a language gal but you're making it very difficult by being so dense.
And I'm telling you that in English, gender has NOTHING to do with biology. You're having a lot of trouble with that for some reason.
I'm chalking this up to ESL and moving on.
@c @Corfiot
And yes, animals also have sex, but there is no reason to mention that in front of the kids.