I'm going to keep hammering my point on keeping around deranged weirdos until everyone either gets it or permalogs.
@mkultra
I don't get it.
@LukeAlmighty
If you don't get it, you are a very fortunate soul spared much "discourse"
If you don't get it, you are a very fortunate soul spared much "discourse"
Incel discourse or Bible Larpers?
Elaborate
@LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
Women are the subjects of politics, IE they are part of the polity and effected by it, but ultimately irrelevant to it in its essence. The essential nature of politics is violence and women are incapable of political violence biologically. Thusly women ought to have no say in the sphere, they cannot truly affect it.
To put it another way, if a man orders men to kill other men, or votes for it, he does so as a man, capable of doing what they do, in principle. A woman cannot do this, and it is thusly morally wrong to expect or place her in a position to send men to death.
Women are the subjects of politics, IE they are part of the polity and effected by it, but ultimately irrelevant to it in its essence. The essential nature of politics is violence and women are incapable of political violence biologically. Thusly women ought to have no say in the sphere, they cannot truly affect it.
To put it another way, if a man orders men to kill other men, or votes for it, he does so as a man, capable of doing what they do, in principle. A woman cannot do this, and it is thusly morally wrong to expect or place her in a position to send men to death.
Responsibility before rights, basically.
@LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
Rights are a formalism around responsibility, not a priveledge. Property rights entail responsibility for property, gun rights entail responsibility for firearms, speech rights entail a certain degree of responsibility for speech, and so on.
But I'm not talking about rights here, I'm talking about realities. Politics is organized violence, and thusly people who cannot enact violence are definitionally a-political. Consider children for example.
Rights are a formalism around responsibility, not a priveledge. Property rights entail responsibility for property, gun rights entail responsibility for firearms, speech rights entail a certain degree of responsibility for speech, and so on.
But I'm not talking about rights here, I'm talking about realities. Politics is organized violence, and thusly people who cannot enact violence are definitionally a-political. Consider children for example.
@LodedDiaper @LukeAlmighty
https://youtu.be/w_urWSSZgwU
I'm essentially trying to re-box the essence of what is being communicated here but from a capabilities standpoint, not choice.
https://youtu.be/w_urWSSZgwU
I'm essentially trying to re-box the essence of what is being communicated here but from a capabilities standpoint, not choice.
In an smaller local government, where im fighting for a community im connected on a personal level and voting has an actual tangible effect. I would be more then willing to join the Militia.
But under the current state of government, where most conflicts are proxy wars in some other country and vote has been made irrelevant. I would be more then willing to give up my vote, instead of fighting for gay sex in Ukraine.
But under the current state of government, where most conflicts are proxy wars in some other country and vote has been made irrelevant. I would be more then willing to give up my vote, instead of fighting for gay sex in Ukraine.
Follow
@LodedDiaper @mkultra
I am prepared to fight in a war to defend my community...
A community 6 people wide. Anyone else is a parasite though.
Elftummy defending his wife.
