>end of fag month
>Scotus announces its cool to say no to fags in regards to compelled speech
>they finally cite religious liberty as a foundational reason why

W E W

@SpurgAnon
End of month, and our government made gay marriage the same entity as straight marriage. For no fucking reason. While we're still suffering from insane inflation.

@LukeAlmighty @SpurgAnon

> For no fucking reason.

wouldn't you need a legal justification to keep them separate? and wouldn't it need to be non-religious in nature? the thing we're talking about here is a legal construct after all, not a religious one (the religious one certainly exists tho)

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
That's actually my problem too.
There are no alternatives to this legal contract, that obviously doesn't fit all the situations.

And by using this exact version now even on same sex couples, it is even less adaptive to the individual needs.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
The natural situation is: people will form groups of mostly 2, and sometimes have kids.

The fact, that the state needs to fuck this natural instinct up with 100 pages legal document is disgusting to me. And now, they will push the same dystopian control on gays too.

@roboneko @SpurgAnon
So, respond already.
WHY DO WE NEED A SINGULAR LEGAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVERY POSSIBLE COMBIMATION OF LONG TERM COHABITATION?

@LukeAlmighty @SpurgAnon we don't necessarily. I didn't make that claim. I'm saying that if the government is going to make eligibility distinctions then those need to be non-religious and non-lots-of-other-stuff as well. but it would probably make a lot of sense for various things to be explicitly split off into separate laws